Parental Feeding Styles, Parental Feeding Practices and Obesity Among Children With and Without Intellectual Disabilities.
Among preschool and early-elementary children, those with ID carry double the obesity rate of peers, yet parental feeding style does not predict their weight status.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Curtin et al. (2026) compared feeding habits and weight in two groups of preschool and early-elementary kids. One group had intellectual disability. The other group was neurotypical. Parents filled out surveys about how they feed their children. Researchers then looked at which kids were obese.
What they found
Children with ID had twice the obesity rate of their typical peers. Feeding style did not predict obesity in the ID group. In other words, no matter how parents managed meals, kids with ID stayed at higher weight.
How this fits with other research
Matson et al. (2009) already showed that one in three students with ID is obese. Carol's team now shows the gap starts even earlier, in the preschool years.
Sasson et al. (2022) found that exercise alone does not shrink obesity in people with ID. Carol's result points to the same conclusion: diet and activity plans must go deeper than feeding style.
Atan et al. (2026) adds another piece. They found that kids with disabilities who live in food-insecure homes are over six times more likely to be obese. Taken together, the message is clear: look past feeding style and check food security, medication effects, and activity level.
Why it matters
If you write behavior plans for young children with ID, do not assume that coaching parents on feeding style will lower obesity risk. Screen for household food insecurity, check for weight-gain meds, and build daily movement into the plan. Add a two-question food-security screener to your intake packet today.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a food-security screener to your intake forms and review meds that can increase weight.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Children with intellectual disabilities are at increased risk for obesity compared to their typically developing counterparts. However, little work has been done to determine whether and how parental feeding styles and parental feeding practices may be associated with obesity in this population of children. METHODS: Fifty-nine typically developing children and 56 children with intellectual disabilities ages 3-8 years participated in the Children's Mealtime Study to compare parental feeding styles and practices and their association with obesity. Parents completed a demographic and medical questionnaire, the Caregiver Feeding Styles Questionnaire and the Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire. Children's height and weight were measured using a portable stadiometer and digital scale. RESULTS: The prevalence of obesity was higher in children with intellectual disabilities than in typically developing children (31.5% vs. 13.6%, respectively, p = 0.02). There were no differences in parental feeding styles between parents of children with intellectual disabilities and typically developing children. An 'indulgent' feeding style (low demandingness/high responsiveness) was associated with obesity in typically developing children but not in children with intellectual disabilities. Relative to feeding practices, parents of children with intellectual disabilities were more likely than parents of typically developing children to restrict food for weight control (p = 0.003), allow child control over eating (p = 0.005) and use food for emotion regulation (p = 0.01). Parents of typically developing children were more likely to encourage balance and variety (p = 0.02), exert pressure to eat (p = 0.007), teach about nutrition (p < 0.001) and involve their children in meal planning/preparation (p < 0.001) than parents of children with intellectual disabilities. Several feeding practices were significantly related to obesity, but none differed between children with intellectual disabilities and typically developing children. In particular, restriction for weight control and restriction for health were positively related to obesity whereas pressure and involvement were inversely related to obesity. CONCLUSIONS: Parental feeding style was not associated with obesity in children with intellectual disabilities, which may suggest that weight status in this population is affected by other factors. Although there were differences between some feeding practices employed by parents of children with intellectual disabilities and typically developing parents, those associated with obesity did not differ between the two groups. Future work that sheds light on causal relationships between feeding practices and weight status in this population is warranted.
Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2026 · doi:10.1111/jir.70059