Object-directed imitation in children with high-functioning autism: testing the social motivation hypothesis.
High-functioning autistic kids copy pointless object actions and stay in sync just like peers, so imitation can be a ready-made strength in your session.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Nielsen et al. (2013) watched kids with high-functioning autism copy silly object moves.
They also watched typical kids do the same moves.
The goal was to see if autistic kids skip moves that have no real purpose.
What they found
Both groups copied every extra step, even the pointless ones.
They also kept in sync with the adult at the same rate.
No sign of lower social drive showed up in these tasks.
How this fits with other research
Cullinan et al. (2001) seems to disagree. That study found autistic youth miss rude social cues more often than peers.
The clash is only on the surface. Mark used action copying; A used verbal scene judging.
Different social channels, different results. Copying body actions can stay intact while judging words fails.
Cary et al. (2024) extend the story. They asked autistic kids directly about social drive and found the kids’ own words predict real-life skills.
Put together, the picture is: ask kids how they feel, watch them move, and test their words—each view adds a piece.
Why it matters
Do not assume a child who talks little will also copy little. If your learner can talk or type, add a quick self-rating question before you plan social goals. Use object-based imitation drills when you need a strength to build on.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Start your next play routine by having the child copy three silly, useless steps with a toy—note if they match you; use that success to shape longer social play chains.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Children with autism show clear deficits in copying others' bodily oriented actions whereas their capacity for replicating others' object-directed actions appears relatively spared. One explanation is that unlike bodily oriented actions, object-directed actions have tangible, functional outcomes and hence rely far less on social motivations for their production. To investigate this, we compared the performance of a group of children with high-functioning autism (HFA) and a group of typically developing (TD) children on two distinct object-directed tasks that are considered highly social: overimitation and synchronic imitation. Our findings were surprising. The HFA children copied all of a modeling adult's actions, including those that had no function or purpose (i.e. they overimitated), and they entered into extended bouts repeating an arbitrary action along with the adult who had a similar object to play with (i.e. they engaged in synchronic imitation). Moreover, they did so at rates indistinguishable from the TD children. This work demonstrates that the capacity and propensity for overimitation and synchronic imitation are intact in children with HFA, and questions whether socially based imitation should be considered an autism-specific deficit.
Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2013 · doi:10.1002/aur.1261