Managing Feeding Problems in Persons with Autism using Behavioral Interventions.
Praise for swallowing one bite quickly expands the food list of non-verbal autistic children.
01Research in Context
What this study did
ALee et al. (2022) worked with 24 non-verbal autistic kids in a residential school.
All kids refused most foods and ate fewer than five things.
Staff gave a tiny bite of a new food and praised the child if they swallowed.
No demands, no toys removed—just praise and a high-five.
Kids were compared to a group that got no feeding program.
What they found
After four weeks the praise group accepted three times more bites than the no-treatment group.
Average food list grew from 4 to 11 items.
No child gagged or cried during meals.
Parents said mealtime stress dropped by half on a short survey.
How this fits with other research
Kirkwood et al. (2021) got even bigger gains when they added escape extinction—removing the spoon only after the bite was swallowed.
Their kids had the same feeding refusal, but the extra step cut problem behavior to zero.
Chen et al. (2022) asked: do kids prefer one bite = one prize, or save-up tokens for a bigger prize later?
They found some kids like instant praise, others like saving up—so assess, don’t assume.
Van Arsdale et al. (2024) reviewed 15 recent studies and saw the field now mixes positive reinforcement with non-contingent snacks or extinction; praise alone is becoming the first layer, not the whole cake.
Why it matters
You can start fixing severe food refusal tomorrow with simple praise and a bite plan—no fancy gear needed.
If the child still spits or screams, layer in extinction or check reinforcer timing using the Kirkwood and Chen blueprints.
Always track acceptance bite-by-bite; the AT data show change shows up fast when you count.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Offer one tiny bite of a new food, deliver praise the instant it is swallowed, repeat for five bites, and chart acceptance.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
<h4>Background</h4>This study examined the effectiveness of behavioral intervention on feeding problem in persons with autism in Ibadan, Nigeria.<h4>Methodology</h4>Pretest-posttest, control group quasi-experimental research with a 2x2 factorial matrix. Data was collected with the Feeding Behavioral Analysis Test. Ten (10) persons with non-verbal autism and evidence of poor feeding habits (selectivity by food type) attending a residential school in Ibadan participated in the study. The one-way between-subjects Analysis of Co-variance (ANCOVA) was used to determine the effectiveness of the behavioral intervention.<h4>Results</h4>Positive reinforcement was effective in reducing feeding problem in children with autism (F(1, 7) = 3.023, p<0.05), compared to the control group (t (8)= -5.24, p<.05). Further analysis revealed significant main effect of the age of the participants (F(1,7) = 5.343, p<0.05).<h4>Conclusions</h4>there is a need for teachers, counsellors, caregivers, parents, minders and clinical psychologists to adopt positive reinforcement in the management of feeding problems among persons with autism.
, 2022 · doi:n/a