Autism & Developmental

Interventions that facilitate socialization in children with autism.

Rogers (2000) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2000
★ The Verdict

Let typical peers lead the game and both social and language gains show up free.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running social groups in schools, clinics, or camps.
✗ Skip if Clinicians only serving non-verbal adults with severe ID.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Embregts (2000) read every paper on social programs for kids with autism. The author grouped the tactics and wrote a big-picture story. No new data were collected.

02

What they found

Peer-mediated plans came out on top. When typical classmates learn how to invite and respond, autistic kids talk and play more.

Best surprise: social gains spilled into language. Kids used new words even when no one taught language directly.

03

How this fits with other research

Lindsay (2002) is a direct two-year update. It keeps the peer focus but adds practice tips for preschool rooms.

Menezes et al. (2021) narrows the lens. Their 18-study review shows inclusive-classroom packages work, matching J’s wide map but giving firmer numbers.

Lopata et al. (2025) stretches the story forward. Their long-term trial finds school and camp social programs still help 1–4 years later, turning J’s short-term hope into lasting fact.

de Jonge et al. (2025) seems to clash. They say a home parent program lifts social engagement without extra peer partners. The gap is age: toddlers may need adults first, peers later.

04

Why it matters

You can stop hunting for the one magic social script. Use peer helpers, keep sessions short and fun, and watch language grow on its own. Start with the five-minute peer intro from Thompson-Hodgetts et al. (2024) at recess, then build fuller peer networks. Social first, language follows.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick one autistic client, train two peer buddies to give share offers and play invites, and tally new social bids for one week.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
narrative review
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Social dysfunction is perhaps the most defining and handicapping feature of autism. Improved social functioning has long been considered one of the most important intervention outcomes. A variety of social interventions have been designed, empirically examined, and published in the autism literature. Children with autism have been found to be responsive to a wide variety of interventions aimed at increasing their social engagement with others, both adults and peers. Successful strategies employing peer-mediated approaches and peer tutoring have involved typically developing peers. Furthermore, several studies have demonstrated that social engagement directly affects other important behaviors like language, even when these behaviors are not specifically targeted by the teaching program. Thus, while an area of severe involvement, social behavior is also responsive to intervention.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2000 · doi:10.1023/a:1005543321840