Autism & Developmental

Interaction of persons with severe mental retardation and their nondisabled co-workers in integrated work settings.

Rusch et al. (1995) · Behavior modification 1995
★ The Verdict

Just putting adults with severe ID in a mainstream job creates quiet exclusion unless you engineer equal, friendly coworker contact.

✓ Read this if BCBAs helping adults with ID keep competitive jobs.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who serve only school-age or fully segregated clients.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Gaylord-Ross et al. (1995) watched workers with severe intellectual disability on the job. They compared how coworkers treated disabled and nondisabled employees doing the same work. The team tracked who got training, work tips, and friendly chat.

02

What they found

Disabled workers were left out. They heard less job information and got fewer teaching moments. Coworkers also talked to them less often and less warmly.

03

How this fits with other research

English et al. (1995) saw the same exclusion in neighborhood settings. Adults with developmental disability living on their own still spent most time with other disabled adults, not neighbors.

Raslear et al. (1992) shows the fix works in schools. When typical students planned and ran lunch-time chats, friendships with disabled classmates grew.

Jones et al. (2010) gives the adult version. Equal-status teamwork, shared goals, and boss support predicted positive coworker attitudes and real social ties.

04

Why it matters

Placement in a regular job is not enough. Without planned contact, coworkers ignore or avoid your client. Use peer-mediated lunch groups like G et al. or build equal-status projects and supervisor cheer-leading like Jones et al. (2010). Structure the social piece, not just the work task.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Ask the supervisor to assign your client and one coworker a shared goal, like restocking shelves together before break, and prompt the coworker to chat during the task.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
46
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
negative

03Original abstract

This investigation matched 23 workers with severe mental retardation to 23 workers without disabilities by job type and minimal duration of employment (at least 6 months) to determine if co-worker relations differed between the two groups of employees. Results indicated that, compared to workers with severe mental retardation, nondisabled workers were more likely to receive information, to receive training, and to interact as friends outside the workplace.

Behavior modification, 1995 · doi:10.1177/01454455950191004