Autism & Developmental

Infantile autism and developmental receptive dysphasia: a comparative follow-up into middle childhood.

Cantwell et al. (1989) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 1989
★ The Verdict

Kids with early receptive dysphasia can out-talk autistic peers by age eight, but may need extra social support as their language improves.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing plans for preschoolers with autism or pure language delay.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only serve older verbal clients.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team tracked two small groups of preschool boys for five years. One group had autism. The other had severe receptive dysphasia, a condition where children cannot understand spoken words. They tested language, play, and social skills every year until the boys were eight to ten years old.

02

What they found

By middle childhood, the picture looked very different. Almost half of the dysphasic boys now spoke in full sentences. Most of the autistic boys still had no useful speech. Surprisingly, the dysphasic boys now showed more trouble making friends than the autistic group. Language had moved forward; social life had slipped back.

03

How this fits with other research

Reichard et al. (2019) later showed that receptive vocabulary in autistic children keeps growing at the same slow pace as typical peers. Their data fit the current study: autistic kids do gain words, just never enough to close the gap. Cohen et al. (1990) found that autistic preschoolers can beat normative language growth rates no matter what classroom they sit in. That hopeful message lines up with the small gains seen here. McGonigle-Chalmers et al. (2013) add a twist: even nonverbal autistic kids can understand grammar on a touch screen. The present study saw almost no spoken output, but receptive syntax may still be hiding inside.

04

Why it matters

When you write an IFSP or an IEP, set separate goals for understanding words and for using them. A child who looks 'nonverbal' might still follow complex syntax. Also watch peer skills in kids who once had only language delay; their social risk can rise after the words show up. Plan social groups and peer modeling early, not just speech drills.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Test receptive syntax with a simple touch-screen task before you assume a child cannot understand complex sentences.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
case series
Population
autism spectrum disorder, developmental delay
Finding
mixed

03Original abstract

An interim follow-up study of a group of "higher functioning" boys with infantile autism and control group of boys with severe (receptive) developmental language disorder (or dysphasia) is reported. The boys were compared both initially and at follow-up for overall functioning in the areas of language, peer relationships, stereotyped behaviors, and disruptive public behaviors, as well as for the presence of a number of specific symptoms. In some respects, the behaviors that differentiated the groups initially did so also at follow-up, although there were important differences. Very few of the autistic boys had good language skills at follow-up, whereas nearly half of the dysphasic group were communicating well, a difference that is striking in view of the initial general similarity between the groups in terms of poor language functioning. However, some of the dysphasic children had developed greater difficulties in peer relationships. The implications for concepts of the nature of the deficit in severe receptive developmental language disorders are considered.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1989 · doi:10.1007/BF02212715