Autism & Developmental

Increasing simple toy play in profoundly mentally handicapped children. I. Training to play.

Murphy et al. (1985) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 1985
★ The Verdict

Praise alone slightly raises toy touching but fails to create meaningful play—add partners and richer prompts.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing play goals for older kids with profound ID in school or clinic rooms.
✗ Skip if Clinicians focused on verbal adults or clients who already show pretend play.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team worked with eight kids . All had profound intellectual disability.

Staff used praise and small food treats each time a child touched a toy. Sessions ran for 20 minutes.

The goal was to see if this simple reward plan would spark real, constructive play.

02

What they found

Toy touching went up a little, but kids still did not build, stack, or pretend.

Scores for independent play stayed flat. The training beat doing nothing, yet the gain was tiny.

03

How this fits with other research

Pisman et al. (2020) later showed parents can mix language goals into play and keep it fun. Their kids stayed interested because moms followed the child’s lead.

Anonymous (2019) also saw no staff-training benefit, but with adults in group homes. Both null results warn that training staff alone may not move the needle.

Mazur et al. (1992) proved kids with ID can learn new skills when peers do the teaching. Peer delivery, not just praise, may be the missing piece.

04

Why it matters

If you run play programs for profoundly impaired learners, do not stop at “touch the toy.” Add peer models, caregiver turns, or embedded language. Start with a quick preference check like Buhrow et al. (2003) to be sure the toy is wanted, then build small play chains, not single contacts.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick a peer buddy, have them model stacking two blocks, then praise the learner only for copying the full stack.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
quasi experimental
Sample size
20
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
null
Magnitude
negligible

03Original abstract

The purpose of this study was to increase simple toy play in profoundly mentally handicapped children. Twenty children (mean chronological age, 14 years; mean mental age, less than 1 year) were trained to play with ordinary toys, half by a behavior modification technique and half by a control procedure. The operant training led to some increases in total toy contact but did not appear to be significantly more effective than the control technique in promoting independent constructive play. The possible reasons for the relative lack of success of the behavioral training are discussed.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1985 · doi:10.1007/BF01531782