A pilot study on early home-based intervention through an intelligent baby gym (CareToy) in preterm infants.
A four-week smart baby-gym program lifted motor and vision scores in low-risk preterm infants.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Doctors sent a smart baby-gym home with families of preterm babies. The gym has 202 built-in games that move toys, lights, and sounds in set patterns.
Parents set the baby on the mat for short daily play blocks. The study compared these babies to others who got only the usual clinic check-ups.
What they found
After four weeks the gym babies scored higher on motor and vision tests. Standard-care babies improved less in the same month.
How this fits with other research
Pisman et al. (2020) also ran home play lessons, but they coached parents to add language prompts instead of handing over a device. Both studies saw gains, showing home play works with or without high tech.
Osnes et al. (1986) built single toys that blinked or buzzed when touched. Their older kids with profound delays played more and stereotyped less. Giuseppina’s smart gym packs the same instant-payoff idea into one mat for infants.
Carr et al. (1985) tried pure operant training and saw only tiny play gains. Pairing that null result with Giuseppina’s positive finding hints that toys must be extra engaging, not just adult prompting, to move the needle.
Why it matters
You can recommend tech-augmented play mats for preterm clients when families want a home boost between visits. The setup is parent-friendly: place baby, press start, let the mat cycle through games. Track motor and visual milestones weekly; if gains stall, pair the gym with caregiver coaching as Pam did in later work.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Loan or demo a sensory baby-gym and teach parents one 10-minute daily routine; chart visual tracking and head-lift counts each week.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
BACKGROUND: CareToy is an intelligent system, inspired by baby gyms, aimed to provide an intensive, individualized, home-based and family-centred early intervention (EI) program. AIMS: A pilot study was carried out to explore the feasibility of CareToy intervention in preterm infants, aged 3-9 months of corrected age. METHODS: Twenty low-risk preterm infants, without brain lesion or other clinical complications (14 allocated to CareToy intervention and 6 to Standard Care) were recruited. The Infant Motor Profile (IMP) was predefined as the primary outcome measure and Alberta Infant Motor Scale and Teller Acuity Cards as secondary measures. Moreover, 202 pre-programmed training scenarios were developed and instructions for the management of CareToy intervention were defined as general guidelines. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: All infants received 4 weeks of their allocated intervention and were evaluated with the selected tests before and immediately after the 4 weeks. The mean difference changes in IMP total score and Teller Acuity Cards over the intervention period were higher in the CareToy group than in the Standard Care group. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: CareToy seems a feasible device for providing EI. An adequately powered randomized clinical trial is warranted.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2016 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2016.01.013