Autism & Developmental

Increasing on-task behaviour through interruption-prompting.

Duker et al. (1996) · Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR 1996
★ The Verdict

A simple desk-tap prompt each time stereotypy starts can pull kids back to work without extra rewards.

✓ Read this if BCBAs in residential or classroom settings who need a low-prep, low-cost prompt for stereotypy.
✗ Skip if Teams already using enriched outdoor breaks or pre-session stereotypy time as the main plan.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Five children with autism and intellectual disability kept spinning, flapping, or rocking during work time. The team watched each child for one minute. Every time stereotypy started, the teacher tapped the desk and said, "Do your work." No stickers, no snacks, just that quick prompt.

The study ran an ABAB reversal. First week: no prompts. Second week: prompts every time. Third week: prompts off. Fourth week: prompts back on. They counted how many seconds each child stayed on task.

02

What they found

When the prompt was on, on-task time jumped up for every child. When the prompt stopped, work time dropped right back. The change was big enough to see by eye on the graph.

The team never added extra reinforcers. Simply breaking the stereotypy chain was enough to bring the kids back to the task.

03

How this fits with other research

Lang et al. (2009) extends this idea. They let one child play with her stereotypy for five minutes before work. That free time cut later stereotypy and boosted play skills. C et al. interrupt during work; Russell et al. front-load before work. Both lower stereotypy, just at different times.

Hagopian et al. (2000) looks similar but lands mixed. They tried blocking stereotypy and also using it as reinforcement. Blocking alone helped two of three kids; the third only improved when he earned stereotypy breaks. Their data say: try the simple block first; add reinforcers only if needed.

Weiss et al. (2001) took a different road. They sent adults outside or to a Snoezelen room instead of interrupting. Outdoor play cut stereotypy the most. Together these papers show: you can either change the setting or interrupt the behavior—both work, but outdoor fun needs no trial-by-trial watching.

04

Why it matters

You can run this tactic today. Watch for the first spin or hand-flap. Give a quick, calm cue: "Keep working." No need to set up a token board or open the M&M bag. If the child’s hands are busy with the task, they can’t flap. One prompt, one moment, big pay-off in engagement.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Count stereotypy for ten minutes, then add an immediate, neutral interruption prompt each time it starts and measure again.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
reversal abab
Sample size
5
Population
autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability
Finding
positive
Magnitude
large

03Original abstract

This study was designed to assess the effects of response-contingent interruption-prompting of stereotypic behaviour on on-task behaviour, inactivity and inappropriate behaviour. Also, the relationship between these behaviours was investigated. Five individuals with severe intellectual disability and autism participated. Data were collected within a reversal design. The results showed a statistically significant increase of on-task behaviour when interruption-prompting of stereotypic behaviour was in effect. Inactivity was statistically related to inappropriate behaviour. In terms of the continuous effort to identify procedures that are least intrusive for the client to attain behaviour improvement, it is suggested that interruption-prompting of stereotypic behaviour may be a reasonable choice for practicians.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 1996 · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2788.1996.775775.x