Autism & Developmental

Hardiness and social support as predictors of psychological discomfort in mothers of children with autism.

Gill et al. (1991) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 1991
★ The Verdict

Hardy moms with strong support feel less depressed and sick—so screen for both and shore them up fast.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running parent training or intake assessments in autism clinics.
✗ Skip if RBTs who only deliver 1:1 therapy with no parent contact.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Researchers asked 59 moms of kids with autism to fill out three short surveys.

The surveys measured how tough-minded each mom felt, who she could lean on, and how much she felt sad or sick.

Then the team used simple stats to see if tough minds or strong support protected the moms from distress.

02

What they found

Moms who scored high on hardiness had fewer signs of depression and fewer body aches.

Moms with more social support also felt better in both areas.

Each factor helped on its own; together they helped even more.

03

How this fits with other research

Capio et al. (2013) extends this work by adding a stress hormone test. They found that moms with flat daily cortisol patterns were the most worn-out. The survey and the spit test point to the same moms who need help first.

Takahashi et al. (2023) used the same survey style in Chinese moms of kids with ID. They also saw that family support shaped how moms parent. The culture and diagnosis differ, but the shield of support looks the same.

Higgins et al. (2021) shows why this matters for data you collect. Stressed moms rate their kids’ problem behavior higher than clinicians do. Lowering mom stress could make parent reports more accurate.

04

Why it matters

You can spot at-risk moms with two quick questions: Who can you call at 2 a.m.? and How well do you bounce back from bad days? Add these items to your intake. Moms who score low get first dibs on respite care, peer groups, or brief CBT. Less stressed moms give clearer data and stick with treatment plans longer.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add two lines to your intake form: rate social support (1-5) and hardiness (1-5); flag totals ≤6 for immediate parent support services.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
survey
Sample size
60
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
positive
Magnitude
medium

03Original abstract

Mothers of 60 children with autism participated in this study to measure the effects of social support and hardiness on the women's responses to the stressful demands of raising a child with a disability. MANOVA analysis indicated a significant main effect for hardiness, Wilks' lambda = .859, approx. F(2, 55) = 4.494, p less than .02. There were no main effects for social support, or for the interaction of social support and hardiness. In regression analyses, the best combination of predictors of depressive symptoms were the Commitment dimension on the Hardiness Questionnaire and the total score on the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List social support inventory, mult. R = .783, p less than .001. The best predictor of somatic complaints was total Hardiness score, mult. R = .698, p less than .01. There was a significant correlation between hardiness and perceived social support, r(57) = -.67, p less than .001. Results are discussed in terms of the relationship between perceived social support and hardiness and the potential buffering effect of these dimensions.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1991 · doi:10.1007/BF02206867