Autism & Developmental

Engaging with the self: Mirror behaviour in autism, Down syndrome and typical development.

Reddy et al. (2010) · Autism : the international journal of research and practice 2010
★ The Verdict

Autistic kids may know the mirror shows 'me,' but they still act less social in front of it.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running social-skills groups or early-intervention home programs.
✗ Skip if Practitioners focused only on older, fluent speakers or vocational tasks.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team watched preschoolers play in front of a mirror. They compared kids with autism, kids with Down syndrome, and typically developing kids.

They counted how often each child copied their own moves, smiled at themselves, or gave a shy, coy smile. They also checked if the child knew the mirror showed their own image.

02

What they found

Children with autism copied fewer mirror moves and showed almost no coy smiles. Their positive facial affect was lower than both other groups.

Yet most kids with autism still passed the basic mirror self-recognition test. The social mirror gap was not because they failed to see themselves.

03

How this fits with other research

Last et al. (1984) showed most autistic preschoolers can spot their own face. Vasudevi et al. now add that even with intact recognition, the playful, social side of mirror use is missing.

Schulte-Rüther et al. (2017) seems to disagree: they found automatic facial mimicry was intact in older autistic youth. The gap likely comes from age and task. Preschool free play taps social joy, while lab facial tasks tap quick reflexes.

Hsieh et al. (2014) turned the same mirror setup into teaching. They added joint-attention mirror games and saw self-awareness grow, proving the mirror can be a therapy tool, not just a probe.

04

Why it matters

Mirror play gives you a 60-second snapshot of social-self engagement. If a child copies moves, smiles, or shows coy affect, social motivation is online. If the mirror draws a blank, embed social rewards there: model silly poses, pair the reflection with favorite items, or invite a peer to join the game. Tracking coy smiles over weeks can show whether your social interventions are reaching the child's sense of self.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

During play, place a shatter-proof mirror near the child; model one silly pose and deliver a preferred item only if the child copies or smiles at the reflection.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
38
Population
autism spectrum disorder, down syndrome, neurotypical
Finding
mixed

03Original abstract

Children with autism achieve mirror self-recognition appropriate to developmental age, but are nonetheless reported to have problems in other aspects of a sense of self. We observed behaviour in the mirror in 12 pre-school children with autism, 13 pre-school children with Down syndrome (DS) and 13 typically developing (TD) toddlers. Reliable differences in reflecting actions, social relatedness and positive affect towards themselves, and an absence of coy smiles differentiated the children with autism from the others. The children with DS showed the highest interest in their own faces. These differences were largely independent of mirror self-recognition (MSR), broadly supporting arguments for dissociation between interpersonal and conceptual aspects of self. Mirror behaviour may be a subtle but easily elicited measure of the social quality of a sense of self.

Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2010 · doi:10.1177/1362361310370397