Autism & Developmental

Empathy and face processing in adults with and without autism spectrum disorder.

Rigby et al. (2018) · Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research 2018
★ The Verdict

Moving faces trip up autistic adults more than still ones, so slow your video models and allow extra response time.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching social skills to teens or adults with autism in clinic, school, or day-program settings.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who work only with autistic toddlers or who rely solely on static picture cards.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Davis et al. (2018) asked adults with and without autism to name faces and read emotions. Some faces stayed still. Others moved like real people talking.

The team timed answers and counted errors. They wanted to see if motion made the task harder for autistic adults.

02

What they found

Autistic adults were slower and made more errors on every face task. The gap grew when faces moved.

The trouble showed up for both identity ('Is this the same person?') and emotion ('Is she happy or sad?').

03

How this fits with other research

Georgopoulos et al. (2022) looks like a flat contradiction. They also tested autistic adults and found only tiny, 'weakly positive' emotion-recognition differences. The key gap: Antonia used still photos and cartoons; N used moving faces. Motion seems to be the stress test that reveals the deficit.

Shire et al. (2019) adds another twist. Their autistic adults recognized emotions in film clips just as well as neurotypicals, but they stared longer at background objects. Again, the clips were mostly static shots, not the full-motion talking faces that hurt performance in N's lab.

Evers et al. (2015) and Schlundt et al. (1999) foreshadow the result. Both saw similar, or larger, emotion-recognition lags in autistic children. N shows the problem does not fade with age; it simply hides until faces start moving.

04

Why it matters

If you run social-skills groups, slow down video models and check that learners still catch the emotion. Pause on key frames and ask, 'What is her face saying?' before you press play. For in-vivo coaching, give clients extra processing time during live conversation. Motion matters more than we thought.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Play a 5-second clip of a smiling face, pause, ask the learner to name the emotion, then replay at half speed and check again.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Sample size
32
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
negative
Magnitude
medium

03Original abstract

UNLABELLED: Many factors contribute to social difficulties in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The goal of the present work was to determine whether atypicalities in how individuals with ASD process static, socially engaging faces persist when nonrigid facial motion cues are present. We also sought to explore the relationships between various face processing abilities and individual differences in autism symptom severity and traits such as empathy. Participants included 16 adults with ASD without intellectual impairment and 16 sex- and age-matched controls. Mean Verbal IQ was comparable across groups [t(30) = 0.70, P = 0.49]. The two groups responded similarly to many of the experimental manipulations; however, relative to controls, participants with ASD responded more slowly to dynamic expressive faces, even when no judgment was required; were less accurate at identity matching with static and dynamic faces; and needed more time to make identity and expression judgments [F(1, 30) ≥ 6.37, P ≤ 0.017, ηp2  ≥ 0.175 in all cases], particularly when the faces were moving [F(1, 30) = 3.40, P = 0.072, ηp2  = 0.104]. In the full sample, as social autistic traits increased and empathic skills declined, participants needed more time to judge static identity, and static or dynamic expressions [0.43 < |rs | < 0.56]. The results suggest that adults with ASD show general impairments in face and motion processing and support the view that an examination of individual variation in particular personality traits and abilities is important for advancing our understanding of face perception. Autism Res 2018, 11: 942-955. © 2018 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. LAY SUMMARY: Our findings suggest that people with ASD have problems processing expressive faces, especially when seen in motion. It is important to learn who is most at risk for face processing problems, given that in the general population such problems appear to be linked to impaired social skills and empathy. By studying relationships between different abilities and traits, we may be able to find better ways to diagnose and support all people on the autism spectrum.

Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2018 · doi:10.1002/aur.1948