Demands in reflecting about another's motives and intentions modulate vicarious embarrassment in autism spectrum disorders.
Adults with ASD feel normal vicarious embarrassment for accidents, but not for intentional gaffes—so teach them to spot the intent behind the act.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers asked 32 high-functioning adults with ASD and 32 matched adults to watch short videos.
Each clip showed a person doing something awkward, like spilling coffee or wearing a silly costume.
Some acts were accidents; others were done on purpose to get laughs.
After each clip, viewers rated how embarrassed they felt for the actor.
What they found
Both groups felt equal vicarious embarrassment when the mishap was an accident.
When the actor meant to look foolish, the ASD group gave much lower embarrassment ratings.
The drop was large enough to show the problem is not general empathy, but reading intent.
How this fits with other research
Sherwell et al. (2014) saw the same pattern: adults with ASD could not work backward from a happy face to guess what gift had been given.
Together the studies say, "They see the emotion, but miss the hidden motive."
Deliens et al. (2018) looked at pragmatic language and found a mirror image: adults with ASD understood simple indirect requests yet failed on irony.
The new data extend that selectivity into the emotion world—accidental faux pas are understood, intentional ones are not.
Begeer et al. (2014) showed children with ASD also struggle with counterfactual emotions like relief; the adult embarrassment gap may be the grown-up version of the same mentalizing step.
Why it matters
In social-skills groups, do not assume a client who laughs at slapstick understands why a prank is embarrassing.
Probe intent first: ask, "Was that on purpose?" and teach the hidden social rule.
Role-play both accidental and deliberate mishaps, then compare feelings out loud.
This small tweak targets the exact mentalizing gap the paper flags, saving you time and boosting client insight.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add one "on purpose vs. accident" clip to your session, pause, ask clients to rate embarrassment, then reveal intent and re-rate.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The affective responses to another person's condition depend on the ability to reflect about another's thoughts and intentions. This is relevant also for high-functioning individuals with ASD who have considerable difficulties in reading the intentions of others. With the present study we introduce a novel paradigm to induce vicarious embarrassment as a form of social pain. We predicted that the vicarious embarrassment experiences of high-functioning individuals with ASD should specifically decline in social contexts that require reflecting on another's intentions. Thirty-two young adults with high-functioning ASD were matched with regards to age, gender, and verbal IQ to a control group. Vicarious embarrassment was examined with previously validated stimuli describing 30 situations that elicit vicarious embarrassment in the observer. The situations manipulated whether the displayed protagonist either accidentally or intentionally transgressed a social norm in public and participants rated their vicarious embarrassment from the observer's perspective. The ASD group showed comparable vicarious embarrassment experience in response to observing another's accidental norm transgressions but significantly reduced vicarious embarrassment when observing another who intentionally violated socials norms. Vicarious embarrassment was significantly correlated with trait empathy in the ASD group. In complex social scenarios individuals with ASD are impaired in reporting experience of vicarious embarrassment, primarily when it is required to reflect on another's intentions. The present study thus contributes to a better understanding of how persons with ASD are affected in the diversity of empathic processes in the social, everyday life environment they are embedded in.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2013 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.01.009