Creativity and imagination in autism and Asperger syndrome.
Autistic kids' creative ideas stay stuck in reality—plan activities that rely on concrete objects rather than open-ended imagination prompts.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Webb et al. (1999) ran three tests with autistic and Asperger kids. They asked them to think up new uses for common objects and to finish unfinished stories.
The team counted how many ideas each child gave and how wild or make-believe the ideas were. They compared these scores to those of neurotypical peers.
What they found
The autistic group produced fewer ideas overall. Their ideas stayed close to real-world facts and rarely entered pretend territory.
Kids with autism also struggled to switch from one idea to another, a sign of executive dysfunction.
How this fits with other research
Eggleston et al. (2018) later showed that poor executive function, not age, best predicts weak imaginative drawings in autism. This backs the 1999 view that rigid thinking blocks creativity.
Terrett et al. (2013) found similar limits when asking autistic kids to picture future personal events. Fewer details and less richness matched the 1999 pattern.
Greenlee et al. (2024) seems to disagree: adults with autism formed mental scenes just as accurately as controls. The gap may close with age or when the task is visual instead of verbal.
Why it matters
If you run art, writing, or pretend-play lessons, swap open-ended prompts for concrete starters. Hand the child a real box and ask, "What three things can this box hold?" instead of "Imagine anything." Build in supports like picture cues or sentence starters to ease executive load.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Give a real object and ask for three realistic uses before asking for anything make-believe.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Three studies are reported that address the often described impoverished creativity in autism. Using the Torrance Creativity Tests, Experiment 1 found that children with autism and Asperger syndrome (AS) showed impairments. Experiment 2 tested two explanations of these results: the executive dysfunction and the imagination deficit hypotheses. Results supported both hypotheses. Children with autism and AS could generate possible novel changes to an object, though they generated fewer of these relative to controls. Furthermore, these were all reality-based, rather than imaginative. Experiment 3 extended this using a test of imaginative fluency. Children with autism and AS generated fewer suggestions involving attribution of animacy to foam shapes, compared to controls, instead generating reality-based suggestions of what the shapes could be. Although this is evidence of executive dysfunction, it does not directly account for why imaginative creativity is more difficult than reality-based creativity.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1999 · doi:10.1023/a:1022163403479