Autism & Developmental

Building choice opportunities within occupational programmes for persons with profound developmental disabilities.

Lancioni et al. (1993) · Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR 1993
★ The Verdict

Adults with profound disabilities can learn to choose their work when the choice is built into the task itself.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running adult day or vocational programs
✗ Skip if Practitioners who only serve highly verbal clients

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Taras et al. (1993) built a simple computer job for two adults with profound disabilities.

The screen showed two picture boxes. A tap on either box started a different workshop task.

One person had used the computer before. The other had not.

02

What they found

Both adults stayed busy with real work after they tapped their pick.

The experienced user learned to choose quickly. The new user needed more help at first.

Choice showed up faster when the person already knew the computer setup.

03

How this fits with other research

Stasolla et al. (2014) copied the idea but swapped the computer for light sensors. Their two clients also chose more and smiled more while stereotypy dropped.

Shih et al. (2012) added a Wii Remote. Clients pressed a button to turn on music or lights right after they finished a work step. Work output jumped, showing the choice trick works with other gadgets too.

Armas Junco et al. (2025) moved choice out of the workshop and into group homes. Adults who got daily pick chances gained far more self-determination than adults who only received staff support. The table-top lesson scales up to real life.

04

Why it matters

You can teach choice-making even when someone has no speech and limited hand use. Put two big buttons or sensors in reach and let the job start only after a pick is made. Start with clients who already like screens or lights; they learn the routine fastest. Once the habit is strong, fade the tech and move the choices into everyday tasks like picking the lunch seat or the job order. More choices today mean more self-direction tomorrow.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add two big buttons to one work station; the client must press one to start the task.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
single case other
Sample size
2
Population
developmental delay
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Choice opportunities were arranged within the occupational programmes of two subjects with profound developmental disabilities. The subject participating in Experiment 1 was already familiar with a computer-aided programme aimed at promoting independent occupation. That programme was now extended to allow him to choose activities and reinforcers. He was also exposed to a control programme involving the use of folders with drawings. The subject participating in Experiment 2 had no previous experience with special programmes. For this subject, two versions of a computer-aided programme were used: one to teach occupational engagement without choice; and the other occupational engagement with choice. The results have shown that the first subject was very successful in combining choice behaviour and constructive activity with the computer-aided programme, but not with the control programme. The second subject learned very rapidly independent activity engagement, but required relatively long time to develop 'meaningful' choice behaviour. General implications of the findings are discussed.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 1993 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.1993.tb00867.x