Brief Report: Joint Attention and Information Processing in Children with Higher Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorders.
Initiating joint attention does not give higher-functioning kids with ASD the usual memory lift—plan extra supports.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Mundy et al. (2016) watched higher-functioning kids with ASD look at pictures.
Sometimes the child pointed to share interest. That moment is called initiating joint attention.
Later the team tested which pictures the kids remembered. They compared the group to typical peers.
What they found
Typical kids remembered the pictures they had shared better. The ASD group did not get that memory boost.
Starting joint attention did not help them encode the scene.
How this fits with other research
Bottema-Beutel (2016) found that responding to joint attention links tightly to language in ASD. Peter’s study shows the initiating form works differently; it does not aid memory.
Piatti et al. (2024) saw weaker right-temporal brain activation when toddlers with ASD responded to joint attention. Together the papers suggest both initiating and responding circuits are atypical.
Li et al. (2021) also found odd encoding strategies in higher-functioning ASD, but in spatial memory. The memory issue may go beyond social scenes.
Why it matters
When you teach social skills, do not assume that initiating joint attention will naturally help the child remember the shared topic. Build in extra review or visual cues. Track whether the child actually keeps the information, not just whether they point.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →After a shared pointing moment, immediately re-show the picture or object and ask the child to name it to secure the memory.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Theory suggests that information processing during joint attention may be atypical in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This hypothesis was tested in a study of school-aged children with higher functioning ASD and groups of children with symptoms of ADHD or typical development. The results indicated that the control groups displayed significantly better recognition memory for pictures studied in an initiating joint attention (IJA) rather than responding to joint attention (RJA) condition. This effect was not evident in the ASD group. The ASD group also recognized fewer pictures from the IJA condition than controls, but not the RJA condition. Atypical information processing may be a marker of the continued effects of joint attention disturbance in school aged children with ASD.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2016 · doi:10.1007/s10803-016-2785-6