Brief report: group social-multimodal intervention for HFASD.
Group social classes lift social IQ yet recess play stays flat unless you add recess-based tactics.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Bauminger (2007) ran a small group class for kids with high-functioning autism.
The class met once a week after school. Kids learned to read faces, share toys, and solve social problems.
Before and after the course the team tested social thinking and watched kids at recess.
What they found
Children scored higher on social thinking tests after the course.
They also played better with partners during structured games.
Yet recess stayed the same. No child played more with peers once the bell rang.
How this fits with other research
McGonigle et al. (2014) later showed big recess gains using CBT that taught perspective-taking. Their RCT doubled positive peer time, so the 2007 null recess result has been superseded.
Rodríguez-Medina et al. (2016) and Syriopoulou-Delli et al. (2012) fixed the same gap by adding peer mediation or initiation training at recess. Both saw lasting peer play, proving the setting can improve when you script the first move.
Spain et al. (2015) reviewed adult groups and found the same pattern: social thinking improves, real-life use stays shaky. The problem is old and crosses ages.
Why it matters
You can teach social rules in a room, but recess needs its own plan. Add peer coaches, initiation drills, or brief perspective games right on the playground. Probe generalization every week so you catch fade-out before it sticks.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Schedule one recess probe this week and train two typical peers to prompt and praise shared play.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Current study is the second part of a 2-year cognitive-behavioral-ecological (CB-E) intervention for high-functioning (HF) children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We examined the utility of a group-centered intervention on children's ability to interact cooperatively with peers during structured and non-structured social situations. Direct (e.g., social problem solving) and indirect (theory of mind; executive function) treatment effects on social cognitive capabilities were also examined. Participants were 26 preadolescent HF children with ASD. Study results demonstrated direct and indirect treatment effects on social cognition and mixed results regarding children's social interaction capabilities. Although children's cooperative capabilities within the intervention group improved, dyadic, and group social interactions during school recess did not. Discussion focused on the utility of such group-intervention in increasing social functioning.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2007 · doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0246-3