Autism & Developmental

Behavioral assessment and treatment of chronic food refusal in handicapped children.

Riordan et al. (1984) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 1984
★ The Verdict

Reinforcement plus a brief three-second spoon press turned chronic food refusal into typical eating that lasted years.

✓ Read this if BCBAs treating children with developmental delays who accept fewer than five foods or have feeding tubes.
✗ Skip if Clinicians working with adults or medically complex cases needing texture gradations.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Four children with developmental disabilities refused almost all food. They were and had feeding tubes or were close to getting them.

The team used a multiple-baseline design across kids. They paired each bite of target food with praise and a small toy. If the child kept lips closed, the feeder gently pressed the spoon for three seconds. No other prompts were given.

02

What they found

Every child began to accept bites. Refusals and head-turns dropped to near zero within 20 meals.

Gains lasted. Parents reported good eating 7-30 months later. Two children had their feeding tubes removed.

03

How this fits with other research

Gabriels et al. (2001) got the same result without any forced bite. They simply kept preferred snacks away for 30-60 min before meals. Both studies show reinforcement works; one adds a gentle prompt, the other uses hunger.

Silbaugh et al. (2018) started with praise and toys alone. When that failed they added the same light physical guidance M et al. used. Success jumped from 0 % to 90 % acceptance. The papers do not clash—they form a sequence: try praise first, add guidance if needed.

Russo et al. (2019) stretched the idea to teens. They used tiny bites and raised the amount each week. Again, reinforcement plus some escape extinction kept the strategy working across ages.

04

Why it matters

You now have a clear ladder for feeding treatment. Start with simple reinforcement and preferred-food control. If the child still clamps shut, a three-second spoon press is safe and fast. Track bites across meals; once acceptance hits 80 %, fade the toy and praise naturally. Document each step so parents and doctors can see why the tube can stay out.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

At the next meal, offer one tiny bite of a non-preferred food, deliver praise and a tiny toy immediately, and apply gentle spoon pressure for three seconds if lips stay closed.

02At a glance

Intervention
feeding intervention
Design
multiple baseline across participants
Sample size
4
Population
developmental delay
Finding
positive
Magnitude
large

03Original abstract

In this study, we examined the eating behavior of four handicapped children, none of whom exhibited self-feeding skills. All children had a history of food refusal and were nutritionally at risk; one child received all nourishment by way of gastrostomy tube. Baseline data taken during mealtimes indicated that all children accepted very little food, expelled food frequently, and engaged in a number of disruptive behaviors. Treatments consisted of one or more of the following contingent events: social praise, access to preferred foods, brief periods of toy play, and forced feeding. Results of multiple-baseline and reversal designs showed marked behavioral improvement for each child and increases in the amount of food consumed. Further improvements were noted at follow-up, which ranged from 7 to 30 months posttreatment.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1984 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1984.17-327