Autism spectrum disorder and early motor abnormalities: Connected or coincidental companions?
Subtle motor delays in 6–12-month-olds may signal broader developmental vulnerability when parents carry subclinical ASD traits.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Setoh et al. (2017) wrote a narrative review. They asked: do early motor delays and autism risk travel together?
They focused on babies of parents who show mild ASD traits but do not have a diagnosis. The team pulled together studies that tracked infant movement and later development.
What they found
The review points to one key study: 6- to 12-month-olds with subtle motor lags were more likely to have parents with subclinical ASD traits.
The authors treat these motor hiccups as a red flag for broader developmental vulnerability, not just a coincidence.
How this fits with other research
Özcan et al. (2025) extends the idea. They watched infants after they learned to walk. Babies later diagnosed with ASD did not start gesturing or cooing more, unlike typical babies or those with only language delay. Walking alone did not jump-start communication.
Brisson et al. (2012) gives an earlier clue. Mouth-opening anticipation during spoon feeds was already weaker at 4–6 months in babies who later received an ASD label. Both papers line up: early motor signs can precede social-communication gaps.
Iao et al. (2024) adds hope. In toddlers with ASD, better manual imitation and joint-attention responses predicted bigger language gains 18 months later. So while motor delays may flag risk, targeted motor-social skills can still drive progress.
Why it matters
Watch how 6- to 12-month-olds move, especially if parents show quirky social style. Small lags can whisper “pay attention” long before words are expected. Pair motor play with joint-attention and imitation drills; the same motions that look delayed can become the doorway to language. Don’t wait for walking to “naturally” fix communication—build both side by side.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a quick motor check to your 6–12-month assessments and weave imitation games into every play session.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Research in the past decade has produced a growing body of evidence showing that motor abnormalities in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are the rule rather than the exception. The paper by Chinello and colleagues furthers our understanding of the importance of studying motor functions in ASD by testing a non-clinical population of parents-infant triads. Chinello and colleagues' findings seem to suggest that subclinical motor impairments may exist in the typical population with inherited non-clinical ASD traits. Chinello and colleagues' discovery also urges us to ask why motor abnormalities exist in typically developing infants when their parents present some subclinical ASD traits. We believe that there are at least two possibilities. In the first possible scenario, motor impairments and ASD traits form a single cluster of symptoms unique to a subgroup of individuals with autism. A second possible scenario is that motor atypicalities are the first warning signs of vulnerability often associated with atypical development. In conclusion, Chinello et al.'s findings inform us that subclinical atypical phenotypes such as sociocommunicative anomalies may be related to subclinical motor performances in the next generation. This adds to our knowledge by shedding some light on the relation of vulnerability in one domain with vulnerability in another domain.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2017 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2016.11.001