Autism & Developmental

Antecedent stimulus control: using orienting cues to facilitate first-word acquisition for nonresponders with autism.

Koegel et al. (2009) · The Behavior analyst 2009
★ The Verdict

A brief, child-specific orienting cue placed before a verbal model can produce first words in nonverbal children with autism who have failed under standard teaching.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running early-intervention verbal behavior programs for nonverbal preschoolers with autism.
✗ Skip if Teams already seeing spontaneous speech from their learners or working with older, conversational clients.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Matson et al. (2009) worked with nonverbal children with autism who had not spoken after months of standard verbal teaching. The team first watched each child to see what sound or sight made the child turn toward an adult. They then used that personal cue right before showing a toy and saying its name. The design was a multiple baseline across kids, so the cue started at different times for each child to show the cue, not something else, caused any new words.

The cues were tiny and unique. One child looked up when he heard a soft click, another when the adult tapped the table. These micro-signals lasted only a second and came right before the adult model.

02

What they found

Every child began to echo or say the target word once his personal cue was added. Some children kept the new words even after the cue was faded. The study showed that a silent, child-specific orienting cue can unlock first speech in kids who had made zero progress with regular models alone.

03

How this fits with other research

Cooper (1997) first argued that visual cues should be tried when preschoolers with autism ignore spoken lessons. L et al. now add auditory or tactile cues to that toolbox and give single-case proof that the idea works. Baharav et al. (2008) paired caregiver video with an FM auditory trainer and also saw first words pop out, but they used a whole video screen; L et al. prove that a much smaller, momentary cue is enough.

Gray (2024) used the same multiple-baseline design to teach receptive words in short clinic bursts. Both studies show quick language gains with tight single-case control, but L et al. target expressive first words while Gray targets understanding.

04

Why it matters

If you have a silent preschooler who has plateaued with standard echoic trials, probe for a micro-cue that orients the child toward you. It might be a finger snap, a whisper, or a tiny light. Insert that cue right before your model for five trials, then fade it once speech starts. This low-cost tweak can turn nonresponders into speakers without extra hours or new staff.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Test three potential micro-cues with your silent learner; use the one that reliably turns the child’s head right before your next echoic trial and record any new vocalizations across ten trials.

02At a glance

Intervention
prompting and fading
Design
multiple baseline across participants
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Although considerable progress has been made in improving the acquisition of expressive verbal communication in children with autism, research has documented that a subpopulation of children still fail to acquire speech even with intensive intervention. One variable that might be important in facilitating responding for this nonverbal subgroup of children is the use of antecedent orienting cues. Using a multiple baseline design, this study examined whether individualized orienting cues could be identified, and whether their presentation would result in the production of verbal expressive words. The results showed that this antecedent stimulus control procedure produced improvements in responding to verbal models in all of the children, and subsequent gains in speech for some of the children. Theoretical and applied implications of orienting cues as they relate to antecedent stimulus control for children with autism are discussed.

The Behavior analyst, 2009 · doi:10.1007/BF03392190