An analysis of the generalization of pretend play from real objects to toys
Train the real action first, then hand over the toy—kids with autism are more likely to pretend.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Three preschoolers with autism learned pretend actions with real objects.
They practiced pouring from a real cup, stirring with a real spoon, and talking on a real phone.
Later the team watched if the kids did the same actions when handed toy versions of those items.
What they found
All three children used the toys to pretend after training with real items.
Some toys transferred better than others; the toy phone worked best, the toy cup least.
Skills stayed high one month later.
How this fits with other research
Ptomey et al. (2021) and Brodhead et al. (2019) also got pretend play to generalize, but they used video clips and question-and-answer drills instead of real objects.
Agana et al. (2025) shows you can skip screens and extra talk; just let kids handle the real thing first.
Lee et al. (2020) taught flexible "this stands for that" play with words; Agana’s method is simpler—match real action to toy action.
Beaumont et al. (2008) used the same prompt-and-fade style for peer play, proving the tactic works across play types.
Why it matters
If a child won’t pretend with toys, start with the working kitchen item, real hairbrush, or actual flashlight.
Once the action is solid, swap in the mini toy and give a quick prompt.
You may see faster generalization with no extra programming.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one real object the child likes, teach the pretend action to mastery, then offer a toy version and record if the play transfers.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Researchers have reported that children engage in pretend play that reflects the conventional activities of their environment (i.e., learned‐combinations play). In contrast, children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) display fewer and less varied play behaviors. Research on teaching pretend play to children with ASD often involves prompting and reinforcing scripted responses. Although effective, these procedures may be limited because they can produce rigid, rote play rather than pretend play reenacting real‐life events. This study evaluated the effects of teaching actions with real objects on the emergence of generalized learned‐combinations play with three children with ASD. Overall, teaching children actions using real objects facilitated generalization of those actions with toys. We provide future directions for research when limited generalization is observed with some toys. Additionally, we discuss the implications of automatic reinforcement and the motivating operation in relation to our findings.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2025 · doi:10.1002/jaba.70017