A systematic evaluation of food textures to decrease packing and increase oral intake in children with pediatric feeding disorders.
Start with softer food first; it often stops packing and boosts calories without extra steps.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Saunders et al. (2005) tested softer foods on three kids who packed food in their cheeks.
The team served the same meal in two textures: regular and blended.
They measured how much food stayed in the mouth and how many grams each child ate.
What they found
All three children stopped packing when they got the smoother texture.
They also ate more grams and gained weight during the study.
Lower texture alone produced quick, big gains without extra rewards or prompts.
How this fits with other research
The 2018 review by C et al. lists this paper as one key example of antecedent fixes for packing.
Later single-case studies added extra tools: Griffith et al. (2012) showed a drink chaser works, and Amore et al. (2011) added a flipped-spoon cue.
These newer papers do not contradict R et al.; they stack more tactics on top of the same low-texture base.
Why it matters
If a client packs, first check texture before adding complex procedures. Dropping to applesauce, yogurt, or finely blended table food can give you immediate gains with almost no risk. Once packing is low, you can layer in later tools like a chaser or flipped spoon if needed.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Blend the next meal one level smoother and record grams eaten and packing instances.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This study examined packing (pocketing or holding accepted food in the mouth) in 3 children who were failing to thrive or had inadequate weight gain due to insufficient caloric intake. The results of an analysis of texture indicated that total grams consumed were higher when lower textured foods were presented than when higher textured foods were presented. The gram intake was related directly to levels of packing. That is, high levels of packing were associated with higher textured foods and low gram intake, and low levels of packing were associated with lower textured foods and high gram intake. All participants gained weight when texture of foods was decreased. Packing remained low during follow-up for 2 participants even when the texture of food was increased gradually over time. These data are discussed in relation to avoidance, response effort, and skill deficit.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2005 · doi:10.1901/jaba.2005.161-02