A lack of left visual field bias when individuals with autism process faces.
Autistic viewers skip the typical left-side face sweep, so arrange materials front-and-center and teach features explicitly.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Griffith et al. (2012) watched where people looked when faces popped up on a screen. They compared autistic viewers to neurotypical peers using an eye-tracking camera.
The team checked if each group spent more time on the left half of faces. Most people do this without thinking because the right brain handles faces.
What they found
Neurotypical eyes drifted left every time. Autistic eyes stayed in the middle—no left-side pull at all.
The missing bias shows that early face coding works differently in autism.
How this fits with other research
Rojahn et al. (2012) saw the same blank face bias using a quick dot-probe test. Their data line up with M et al.—no automatic face pull in autism.
Faso et al. (2016) seems to disagree. They asked adults to hunt for a face in a crowd and found equal speed in both groups. The trick is task type: free viewing versus active search. When people purposely look, the bias can show up.
Hartston et al. (2024) adds the why. Autistic learners build shaky inner face templates, so the brain has no strong left-side anchor to grab.
Why it matters
If clients don’t automatically favor the left side, don’t expect them to pick up subtle facial cues on their own. Place teaching materials straight ahead or slowly guide gaze with a finger or laser pointer. For emotion ID, zoom in on the left eye region and label what you see. These small layout tweaks turn a hidden brain difference into a teachable moment.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Center face cards in front of the learner and point to the left eye before asking 'How do they feel?'
02At a glance
03Original abstract
It has been established that typically developing individuals have a bias to attend to facial information in the left visual field (LVF) more than in the right visual field. This bias is thought to arise from the right hemisphere's advantage for processing facial information, with evidence suggesting it to be driven by the configural demands of face processing. Considering research showing that individuals with autism have impaired face processing abilities, with marked deficits in configural processing, it was hypothesized that they would not demonstrate a LVF bias for faces. Eye-tracking technology was used to show that individuals with autism were not spontaneously biased to facial information in the LVF, in contrast to a control group, while discriminating facial gender.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2012 · doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1354-2