Assessment & Research

Attentional processing of faces in ASD: a Dot-Probe study.

Moore et al. (2012) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2012
★ The Verdict

Adults with ASD miss the lightning-fast face pull seen in typical peers at 200 ms exposure.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who teach social attending to high-functioning teens and adults.
✗ Skip if Clinicians focused only on receptive language or self-care routines.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team used a dot-probe task to test quick face spotting. Adults with and without autism saw a face and a toy pop up for only 200 ms. They had to press a key as soon as a probe appeared in the spot where the face or toy had been.

The goal was to see if faces pulled attention faster in typical adults than in adults with ASD.

02

What they found

Typical adults pressed faster when the probe replaced the face. Adults with ASD showed no speed boost.

The 200 ms window was too short for the ASD group to show a face bias, pointing to slower or missing automatic social orienting.

03

How this fits with other research

Remington et al. (2012) ran almost the same dot-probe setup the same year and got the same null result, a direct replication that strengthens the finding.

Faso et al. (2016) seems to disagree. They found adults with ASD located faces in a crowd just as fast as typical adults. The key difference is control: the 2016 task let people search on purpose, while the 2012 task captured split-second, automatic shifts.

Griffith et al. (2012) backs the story with children. Kids with autism ignored irrelevant face pictures in a search game, showing the reduced distraction starts early.

04

Why it matters

If faces do not grab attention in the first blink, social learning moments can be lost. When you run social skills groups, prime the learner with a verbal or visual cue before presenting faces. Give extra wait time or use animated avatars that enlarge the eyes and mouth to boost salience. Track response time data during table-top tasks to see if social stimuli speed responses; no change may flag the same bias gap shown here.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Flash a face cue 500 ms before giving an instruction to give clients time to orient.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Population
autism spectrum disorder, neurotypical
Finding
negative

03Original abstract

The present study used the Dot-Probe paradigm to explore attentional allocation to faces compared with non-social images in high-functioning individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and typically developing controls. There was no evidence of attentional bias in either group when stimuli were presented at individually calculated sub-threshold levels. However, at supra-threshold presentation (200 ms), a face bias was found for control participants but not for those with ASD. These results add to evidence of reduced social interest in ASD, relative to controls, and further demonstrate when atypical social processing arises in the attentional time course.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2012 · doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1449-4