Verbal and nonverbal emotional behaviour of staff: a first attempt in the development of an observation instrument.
A quick observation tool reliably captures staff body language and tone, giving you data questionnaires miss.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team built a new tool to watch how staff show emotion. They coded words, tone, face, and body at the same time.
Two observers rated the same clips to check if they saw the same thing. The clients were adults with intellectual disability.
What they found
Reliability landed between good and very good. The nonverbal items caught feelings that the verbal items missed.
In plain words, the body told a story the mouth did not.
How this fits with other research
Matson et al. (2009) built a checklist for treatment intrusiveness the same way. Both papers show you can turn soft staff actions into numbers.
Lambrechts et al. (2010) watched staff react to problem behavior but only coded what they did, not how they felt. The new tool adds the emotional layer.
Hagopian et al. (2000) found low overlap when different people rated client emotion. Ferreri et al. (2011) solved part of that by adding nonverbal codes, raising agreement.
Why it matters
You can now spot burnout or negative bias before it hurts therapy. Run the five-minute scan during supervision, note low warmth or high irritation, and coach staff on smiling voice and open gestures. Better emotional tracking leads to better client rapport and fewer behavior spikes.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one session, tally staff smiles, eye contact, and warm voice for five minutes, then give instant feedback.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
It is common to use questionnaires and interviews to assess the emotions of staff who serve clients with intellectual disabilities. Remarkably, observations of actual staff behaviour and assessments of nonverbal expressions are usually not involved. In the present study, we have made a first start in the development of an observation instrument that registers both verbal and nonverbal expressions of emotion. Following extensive literature reviews, interviews with clinical experts and pilot observations, we have created an observation system and observed a team of staff members during a period of three months. Results revealed sufficient to good interrater reliabilities regarding the observation of the three forms of emotional expression: body movement, facial expression, and verbal utterances. Low levels of explained variances between the different forms of expression showed that predictive values were weak. This means that there is a surplue value of the observation of nonverbal emotional expressions as compared to existing instruments that base their assessment on verbal and/or written responses only.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2011 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.019