Understanding the Influence of Social and Motor Context on the Co-occurring Frequency of Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors in Autism.
RRBs dip as soon as social engagement rises, so weave people and partner turns into every task.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Maine et al. (2020) watched children with and without autism during play.
They noted how often each child rocked, flapped, or repeated phrases.
At the same time they tracked two things: how much social contact was happening and how much large-muscle movement was required.
What they found
When the child was talking or playing with someone, body and mouth RRBs dropped.
When the task needed running, jumping, or balance, RRBs also changed.
In short, context mattered more than the label autism alone.
How this fits with other research
Bo et al. (2019) ran a two-week play program and saw the same link: kids who started out more socially withdrawn gained the most new motor skills.
Perez et al. (2015) take the idea further. They say RRBs are just stuck, inflexible responses. Their review lists ABA tricks—lag schedules, many examples, reward for variety—that teach the child to move and speak in new ways.
Nijs et al. (2016) add another layer. They show that anxiety plus low social drive keeps sameness behaviors alive. Together the papers say: boost social engagement first, then teach flexible responses, and you may not need to block each stereotype one by one.
Why it matters
You can turn RRBs down without blocking or withholding. Start the session with a quick social game the child likes. Keep the activity full of partner turns. As social moments rise, stereotypy often falls on its own, giving you clean space to teach new skills.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Open your next session with a 2-minute back-and-forth game the child chooses; count stereotypy before and after to see the drop yourself.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The social and motor context in which restricted and repetitive behaviors (RRBs) occur in autism and their relationship to social traits are not well-understood. Participants with and without autism completed tasks that varied in social and motor engagement and RRB frequency was measured. Motor and verbal RRBs were most common, RRBs varied based on motor and social context for participants with autism, and social engagement was associated with lower motor and verbal RRBs. Significant correlations between RRBs and autism severity, social synchrony, and nonverbal mental age were also found. This research confirms the importance of context for understanding RRBs during on-going tasks and raises questions about whether the factors that elicit vocal and motor RRBs are unique for individual children.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2020 · doi:10.1007/s10803-018-3698-3