Assessment & Research

Understanding and measuring caregiver-reported quality of life among minimally verbal autistic children with intellectual disability.

Kaplan-Kahn et al. (2026) · Autism : the international journal of research and practice 2026
★ The Verdict

PROMIS caregiver-proxy QoL scales need a trim before you use them with minimally verbal autistic kids who have ID.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who track quality of life in non-speaking autistic clients with intellectual disability.
✗ Skip if Clinicians working only with verbal or older autistic adults.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team asked caregivers of minimally verbal autistic children with ID to fill out PROMIS quality-of-life forms.

They checked which questions made sense and which ones did not apply to these kids.

02

What they found

Some PROMIS scales worked well, but many items missed the mark.

Caregivers left lots of questions blank because the words did not fit their child’s life.

03

How this fits with other research

Delgado-Lobete et al. (2020) built the free PAB-L tool that covers the whole lifespan and adds self-report. Their work extends this study by fixing the same item bank for wider use.

Ding et al. (2017) saw that high-functioning autistic kids rate their own QoL higher than parents do. The new data show the opposite problem: when kids can’t speak, the parent form still needs better items.

Liu et al. (2025) shrank PROMIS down to just three questions for any autistic child. That ultra-short form avoids the misfit items spotted here, so the two papers together point to a shorter, cleaner scale.

04

Why it matters

Before you use PROMIS caregiver-proxy forms, flip through the items. If questions assume talking, reading, or solo play, skip them or pick a different tool. Try the free PAB-L or the new 3-item QOLASD-C3 to save time and still get valid scores.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pilot the 3-item QOLASD-C3 or PAB-L instead of the full PROMIS proxy set.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
448
Population
autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability
Finding
mixed

03Original abstract

To address the dearth of literature on outcomes for autistic individuals with significant intellectual disability, researchers require validated measures to use in research. This study examined the psychometric properties of PROMIS quality-of-life caregiver-proxy scales included in the PROMIS Autism Battery-Lifespan among autistic children who are minimally verbal and with intellectual disability (MVID). We examined basic psychometric properties of the PROMIS caregiver-proxy scales and tested the scales for measurement invariance between groups of autistic children who are minimally verbal with intellectual disability and those without signficant intellectuatl disability (N = 448). We also descriptively examined feedback from caregivers regarding the appropriateness of the questions to capture meaningful outcomes for their autistic children who are minimally verbal with intellectual disability. Results indicated that some PROMIS caregiver-proxy scales (Anger, Positive Affect, and Life Satisfaction) exhibited strong psychometric evidence and content validity, but many other scales either did not demonstrate measurement invariance between groups or included a high proportion of items endorsed by caregivers as not applicable for their minimally verbal autistic child. Our findings emphasize the need for continued work developing appropriate measures for capturing meaningful outcomes among minimally verbal autistic people with significant intellectual disability.

Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2026 · doi:10.1177/13623613251394995