The Verbal Behavior Assessment Scale (VerBAS): construct validity, reliability, and internal consistency.
VerBAS is a quick, reliable caregiver questionnaire that parses communicative functions in people with severe DD.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team built a short checklist called VerBAS. It has 15 items that caregivers fill out.
They gave the scale to people with severe developmental delay. Then they checked if the scores stayed the same when different staff used it.
What they found
The scale held together well. It sorted communication into three clear jobs: asking, answering, and chatting.
Caregivers agreed with each other, so the tool looked trustworthy.
How this fits with other research
Padilla et al. (2021) later tested VB-MAPP, a bigger language map. Their work keeps the same goal but updates the tool set.
Đorđević et al. (2016) moved from caregiver report to direct testing with adults. Their study shows what happens when you switch methods but stay on the communication track.
Hatfield et al. (2019) pooled dozens of parent-response studies. Their big picture says parent talk links to child talk, yet teaching parents more talk does not always lift child words. VerBAS gives you a quick way to track that link.
Why it matters
You now have a five-minute caregiver scale that is psychometrically sound. Use it at intake, after six months, or anytime you need a fast snapshot of communicative functions before you pick language goals.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Hand the 15-item VerBAS to the parent or staff who knows the client best, score it, and let the three function totals guide your next mand, tact, or intraverbal target.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
A questionnaire, the Verbal Behavior Assessment Scale, was developed to assess the communicative functions of individuals with developmental disabilities and severe mental handicap. To assess its psychometric characteristics, the questionnaire, comprising 15 items, was administered to pairs of caregivers of 115 participants. Exploratory factor analysis, involving 11 more participants, revealed satisfactory evidence concerning the distinction of three different communicative functions with the present sample. The questionnaire had good levels of interrater reliability and internal consistency.
Research in developmental disabilities, 1999 · doi:10.1016/s0891-4222(99)00016-5