Autism spectrum disorder and interoception: Abnormalities in global integration?
Weak body-signal wiring may shrink interests and spark pain-based behavior—so screen bodily awareness before you write a behavior plan.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Hatfield et al. (2019) wrote a theory paper. They asked: Do people with autism miss the big picture of body signals?
The team pulled past brain and body studies together. They argued that weak "interoceptive integration" may drive autism traits and extra issues like anxiety.
What they found
The paper does not give new data. It claims that trouble merging heart, gut, and breath cues can shrink interests and cut inner drive.
If the body map is patchy, motivation, feelings, and even pain reports may look different in autism.
How this fits with other research
Fiene et al. (2015) gave the idea legs. Adults with autism scored much lower on thirst and body awareness surveys, showing the real-world gap R et al. talk about.
Shawler et al. (2021) sharpen the point. They warn that many body-awareness scales mix true signals with worry aches. So low scores might track anxiety, not poor integration. The papers fit: first find the gap, then measure it cleanly.
SM (2022) moves the idea into practice. When an FBA hits a wall, SM says, screen for medical pain and interoception problems. R et al. supply the why; SM gives the next step.
Why it matters
You now have a reason to look beyond behavior. If a learner is stuck, flat, or suddenly aggressive, ask: Can they feel what their body needs? A quick body-check interview or parent quiz may flag pain, hunger, or toilet cues that the child cannot merge. Pair that data with your FBA and you may prevent punishing pain-based behavior.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add one body-awareness question ("How does your tummy feel?") to your intake form and note mismatches with observed signs.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Research over the past three decades has seen a revived interest in the way the human body-and the way in which it is perceived-interacts with aspects of our experience. Consequently, interoception (i.e. the perception of physiological feedback from the body) has recently been shown to be associated with a wide range of cognitive, emotional, and affective functions, making it broadly relevant to the study of autism spectrum disorder. Although limited qualitative accounts and empirical studies suggest that individuals with autism spectrum disorder encounter abnormalities when perceiving and integrating physiological feedback from their bodies, other studies have suggested that people with/without autism spectrum disorder do not differ in interoceptive ability after accounting for alexithymia. In this article, we discuss the newly recognized importance of interoception in autism spectrum disorder with a focus on how deficits in the perception of bodily feedback might relate to the core features and co-occuring psychopathology of autism spectrum disorder. Finally, a new integrated theory is advanced which posits that people with autism spectrum disorder may experience a reduced capacity to integrate interoceptive information that may result in a narrow attentional bodily focus and reduced motivational and behavioral drives.
Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2019 · doi:10.1177/1362361317738392