The purported association between depression, aggression, and self-injury in people with intellectual disability: a critical review of the literature.
Aggression and self-injury are not reliable signs of depression in clients with ID—look elsewhere.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Davies et al. (2014) read every paper that claimed hitting, biting, or head-banging in people with intellectual disability is really depression in disguise.
They looked for solid proof that these behaviors are mood symptoms. They found none.
What they found
The review shows the evidence is too thin to treat aggression or self-injury as signs of depression.
No study gives clear rules for when a punch equals a sad mood.
How this fits with other research
Lau et al. (2023) later found low self-esteem and depression often travel together in adults with ID, but they also say causation is still unknown. Their stricter 2023 methods update Ellen’s 2014 warning.
Leung et al. (2011) counted how much self-injury shows up in different genetic syndromes. Their numbers prove these behaviors vary by diagnosis, not by mood.
Matson et al. (2008) linked excessive reassurance seeking to depression in mild ID. That gives you a clearer mood clue than any behavior Ellen’s team reviewed.
Pitchford et al. (2019) show most recent self-injury is automatically reinforced, not emotion-based. This backs Ellen’s point: the old depression story is too simple.
Why it matters
Stop using "depression equivalent" as your go-to explanation. Run a functional analysis first. Track reassurance seeking, activity loss, or sleep change for mood red flags. Treat the behavior you see while you assess the mood you suspect.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a brief mood screen that asks about sleep, appetite, and reassurance seeking before you write "possible depression" in the BSP.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The prevalence of depression in individuals with an intellectual disability is estimated to lie between 3% and 6%. It has been suggested that symptoms of depression in this population might be atypical and include unusual features such as challenging behavior. However, there is significant disagreement regarding the use of challenging behavior as "depressive equivalent" symptomatology. The aim of this review is to evaluate published research reporting on the association between challenging behavior, specifically aggression and self-injury, and depression in people with an intellectual disability as a first step toward evaluating whether challenging behaviors might be considered as depressive equivalent symptoms. The results of the studies identified indicated that the association between depression and aggression, and depression and self-injury are equivocal and the interpretations of the results limited by threats to validity. Based on this analysis, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of challenging behavior as a depressive equivalent symptom. Further research to examine potentially confounding variables and the association between challenging behaviour and depression using methodologically robust designs and measures is clearly warranted.
American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2014 · doi:10.1352/1944-7558-119.5.452