The impact of clarity on hearing-impaired children's face processing: An eye-tracking study.
Hearing-impaired children lack the expected local-face edge and show wide face-processing delays.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Long et al. (2025) watched how hearing-impaired children look at faces. They used eye-tracking while kids judged clear and blurry photos.
The team tested both whole-face and small-part tasks. They wanted to know if poor hearing gives a local-detail edge.
What they found
The children with hearing loss scored lower on every task. Clear or blurry, holistic or local, they were less accurate and slower.
There was no hidden local advantage. Hearing-impaired kids did not pick details better than their normal-hearing peers.
How this fits with other research
Wang et al. (2011) first showed hearing-impaired preschoolers struggle to read facial expressions. The new data push that deficit into late elementary years.
Faja et al. (2009) and Falck-Ytter (2008) found adults and preschoolers with autism also show weak holistic face processing. The gaze patterns differ by diagnosis, but the global weakness is shared.
Van Eylen et al. (2018) report that local-bias effects in autism flip with task demands. Xilian’s null local advantage fits this caution: sensory status alone does not guarantee a detail focus.
Why it matters
If you work with deaf or hard-of-hearing students, do not assume they are natural detail scanners. You will need to teach both whole-face and part-face skills. Add simple face-memory games and explicit feature labeling to your social-skills sessions. Keep pictures sharp at first; clarity did not help these children, but it never hurt.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Start each social lesson with a quick whole-face matching game before moving to parts.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Faces contain a wealth of information, and facial processing plays a significant role in individuals' social development. Facial processing typically includes two methods: holistic processing and local processing. Normal hearing individuals primarily engage in holistic processing when dealing with faces of varying clarity, while hearing-impaired individuals show a local processing advantage for clear faces compared to normal hearing individuals. However, for hearing-impaired individuals, it is still inconclusive which processing method is dominant, and it is unclear whether there is a local processing advantage under low clarity, blurred conditions. Therefore, this study selected 30 hearing-impaired children aged 8-14 years as participants and used normal hearing children as the control group. By employing eye-tracking technology and manipulating the clarity of face images, the study explored the impact of different levels of clarity on the holistic and local processing of faces by hearing-impaired children. The results showed that as facial clarity decreased, the overall judgment accuracy (ACC) of both groups declined, and their reaction times (RT), first fixation duration (FFD), and fixation duration (FD) on the whole face increased. Both groups spent significantly more FD and fixation counts (FC) on the eyes and mouths of clear faces than on blurred faces. Hearing-impaired children's overall judgment ACC and FD for both holistic and local processing were inferior to those of normal hearing children. These results indicated that clarity affected the processing methods of both groups' faces, with a greater reliance on holistic processing and less on local processing as clarity decreased. Under low clarity, blurred conditions, hearing-impaired children primarily engaged in holistic processing just as normal hearing children, but their holistic and local processing of faces of varying clarity were not as good as that of normal hearing children. This indicated that hearing-impaired children not only lacked an advantage in local processing, but also exhibited certain deficiencies.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2025 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2025.104957