The boundaries of the cognitive phenotype of autism: theory of mind, central coherence and ambiguous figure perception in young people with autistic traits.
Theory-of-Mind and central-coherence scores track autistic traits across the whole spectrum, diagnosed or not.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team tested the kids . Half had an autism diagnosis. Half were typical kids with varying levels of autistic traits.
Each child completed three short tasks. One measured Theory of Mind: guessing what a story character thinks. One measured central coherence: finding hidden shapes in busy pictures. One measured ambiguous figure perception: seeing two pictures in one drawing.
Parents also filled out the SRS, a checklist of everyday social behaviors. The question: do the three cognitive scores line up with real-world traits, even below the diagnostic cutoff?
What they found
All three scores predicted SRS totals. Kids who read minds poorly, missed hidden shapes, or saw only one picture scored higher on autistic traits.
The link held across the whole sample, not just the diagnosed half. A child who only misses a diagnosis by one point can still show the same pattern as a child who meets full criteria.
How this fits with other research
Granader et al. (2014) looked at preschoolers with ASD and typical peers. They also found ToM and planning deficits, but only in the diagnosed group. The 2008 study widens the lens: the same weaknesses appear as soon as traits show up, label or no label.
Cohrs et al. (2017) split advanced ToM into social-cognitive and social-perceptual chunks in youth and adults with HFA. They found uneven profiles: some pieces weak, others average. Together with 2008, the picture is clear—ToM is not one thing; it slides along a scale.
Goldfarb et al. (2024) added motor skills to the mix. EF and ToM explained 85 % of social skill variance in 6- to young learners. The 2008 data act as a baseline: if you want that big payoff, start tracking EF and ToM early, before diagnosis is even on the table.
Why it matters
You can spot social-cognitive risk in kids who do not yet carry a diagnosis. A quick story false-belief task or a hidden-figures worksheet gives you numbers that line up with parent concerns. Use these probes during intake, re-eval, or when a client plateaus in social skills training. Targeting ToM and central coherence in your lesson plan may move the needle on broader social behavior, even for sub-threshold learners.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add one 5-minute false-belief story and a hidden-figures worksheet to your intake packet; graph results against the SRS.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Theory of Mind, Weak Central Coherence and executive dysfunction, were investigated as a function of behavioural markers of autism. This was irrespective of the presence or absence of a diagnosis of an autistic spectrum disorder. Sixty young people completed the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ), false belief tests, the block design test, viewed visual illusions and an ambiguous figure. A logistic regression was performed and it was found that Theory of Mind, central coherence and ambiguous figure variables significantly contributed to prediction of behavioural markers of autism. These findings provide support for the continuum hypothesis of autism. That is, mild autistic behavioural traits are distributed through the population and these behavioural traits may have the same underlying cognitive determinants as autistic disorder.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2008 · doi:10.1007/s10803-007-0451-8