The age related prevalence of aggression and self-injury in persons with an intellectual disability: a review.
Challenging behavior in ID peaks in mid-adulthood, so assess early and keep exercise and health checks in the plan.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Bøttcher et al. (2013) pooled every paper they could find on age and challenging behavior in people with intellectual disability.
They asked one question: does hitting, biting, or head-banging happen more often as these adults get older?
The review covered all ages, not just kids.
What they found
Aggression and self-injury climb with age.
The peak is in mid-adulthood, not childhood.
After that, the behaviors slowly drop off again.
How this fits with other research
Burack et al. (2004) extends the picture. They showed that teens and young adults with both autism and severe ID already carry five times more psychiatric and behavior disorders than peers with ID alone.
Ghaziuddin (1997) adds the late-life view. His case series found adults over 75 show high medical morbidity and little challenging behavior, matching the downward slope Louise saw after mid-life.
Hutzler et al. (2010) and Whitehouse et al. (2014) look at the same ID group but focus on physical activity. Their reviews say exercise and peer modeling improve well-being, giving you a proactive tool while behaviors are still rising.
Why it matters
You now have a timeline. Expect more aggression and self-injury between 30 and 50, especially if autism is also in the mix. Start functional assessments and skill-building earlier, not later. Add exercise programs with peer models; they are low-cost and may delay the mid-life peak. Track medical issues as clients age past 65, because behavior often fades while health risks grow.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a 20-minute peer-led walk or dance to the daily schedule and graph any drop in aggression over the next two weeks.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The aim of this study was to analyse statistically published data regarding the age related prevalence of aggression and self-injury in persons with intellectual disability. Studies including prevalence data for aggression and/or self-injury broken down by age band were identified and relative risk analyses conducted to generate indices of age related change. Despite conflicting results, the analysis conducted on included studies considered to be the most methodologically robust indicated that the relative risk of self-injury, and to a lesser extent aggression, increased with age until mid-adulthood, with some indication of a curvilinear relationship for self-injury. These conclusions have implications for the understanding of the development of different forms of challenging behaviour and the importance of early intervention strategies.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2013 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.10.004