Temporal cognition in children with autistic spectrum disorders: tests of diachronic thinking.
Autistic kids struggle to think about events unfolding over time—assess this explicitly when teaching sequencing, planning, or narrative skills.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Boucher et al. (2007) asked autistic and non-autistic kids to think about events that stretch over time.
They used picture stories and verbal tasks to see who could grasp that things change and grow.
Two separate groups of children tried the same tests to check if the results stayed the same.
What they found
Autistic children scored much lower on every diachronic-thinking task.
They had trouble seeing how a seed becomes a tree or how a story unfolds step by step.
The gap stayed large in both samples, showing the problem is reliable.
How this fits with other research
Ganz et al. (2009) and Finke et al. (2017) found similar timing problems in the ear, not the eye. Their autistic listeners needed longer silent gaps to notice sound breaks.
Dudley et al. (2019) pooled 45 studies and saw the same pattern: simple timing often looks fine, but complex time tasks reveal clear deficits.
Together these papers build one story: autistic brains handle clock-time okay yet struggle when events must be stitched into a sequence.
Why it matters
If a learner cannot picture yesterday, today, and tomorrow, schedules, social stories, and self-monitoring will stall.
Probe diachronic thinking before you teach sequencing, planning, or narrative goals. Use visual timelines, act-out sequences, and check understanding of change over time.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Start your next social-story lesson by asking the learner to order three pictures of a seed, sprout, and tree—note if they see the growth chain without prompts.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Impaired diachronic thinking-(the propensity and capacity to think about events spreading across time)-was demonstrated in a 2-Phase study in which children with autism were compared with age and ability matched controls. Identical tests of diachronic thinking were administered in both phases of the study, but to different participant groups, with the same results. The marked impairments shown are therefore robust. Various non-temporal explanations of the findings were eliminated by the results of control tasks in Phase 2. Diachronic thinking did not correlate with verbal or non-verbal ability, age, or mentalising ability, consistent with other evidence of the specificity of diachronic thinking ability. Possible causes of impaired diachronic thinking in autism are discussed.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2007 · doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0285-9