Assessment & Research

Structured skill practice during intensive bimanual training leads to better trunk and arm control than unstructured practice in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy.

Hung et al. (2017) · Research in developmental disabilities 2017
★ The Verdict

Step-by-step skill lists during long bimanual camps trim trunk sway and widen elbow reach for kids with USCP.

✓ Read this if BCBAs planning summer or school-break intensives for children with unilateral CP.
✗ Skip if Clinicians only offering weekly outpatient sessions.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Kids with unilateral cerebral palsy joined six-hour daily bimanual camps. Half got structured practice that moved step-by-step from easy to hard skills. The other half played freely with the same toys for the same hours. Trainers then filmed trunk and arm moves to see who used less body sway and reached farther.

02

What they found

The step-by-step group cut trunk wobble and gained elbow range. Both camps improved how well the two hands worked together. Adding clear skill progressions gave extra gains without extra camp time.

03

How this fits with other research

Geerdink et al. (2015) ran a similar 36-hour camp but added self-management talks. Their kids also got better, showing the hours matter. Yet Hung et al. (2017) proves you can squeeze more out of the same hours just by ordering tasks.

Bonney et al. (2017) looks like a clash. They found variable video-game practice gave no edge over simple repetition for kids with DCD. The kids here had USCP, not DCD, and the coaches watched real toys, not screens. The two studies together hint that structure helps real-world tasks more than screen games.

Chen et al. (2012) used an RCT to test home cycling for strength. Both papers show that clear, focused plans beat vague exercise in CP.

04

Why it matters

If you run summer camps or school intensives, swap free play for leveled skill lists. Start with trunk support, then add reach, then add speed. You keep the same six-hour day but get cleaner moves and less compensation. Write three-step cards tonight and try the first card in your next session.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Make a three-level task card: trunk steady, arm reach, both hands together, and run one five-minute block.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
randomized controlled trial
Sample size
20
Population
other
Finding
positive
Magnitude
medium

03Original abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, intensive practice showed good efficacy in improving upper extremity function for children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy (USCP). However, little is known about the significance of skill progression frequently used during intensive practice. AIMS: We evaluate the importance of skill progression during intensive bimanual practice on movement coordination. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Twenty children with USCP (average age: 8.5; MACS levels: I-III) participated in the study. Ten children were randomly allocated to a structured practice group (SPG) with skill progression, and the other 10 children randomized to an unstructured practice group (UPG) without skill progression. Both groups practiced bimanual activities 6h a day for 15days. Children were asked to perform a bimanual drawer-opening task before and after intensive practice using 3-D kinematic analyses. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Both groups showed improved temporal bimanual coordination with increased normalized movement overlap of the two hands (p=0.005) and decreased goal synchronization time (p=0.002). However, only the SPG showed decreased trunk involvement (p=0.01) and increased elbow joint excursion (p=0.017) with decreased variability (p=0.015 and 0.048 respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The results highlighted the importance of skill progression for intensive practice to improve upper extremity and trunk movement control and consistency for children with USCP.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2017 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2016.11.012