Short report and initial evaluation of the factor structure of the Lancaster and Northgate Trauma Scales (LANTS).
Use the 20-item, four-factor LANTS for trauma screening in adults with ID, but skip the anger and self-harm items until they are fixed.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Wigham et al. (2021) ran the first factor check on the Lancaster and Northgate Trauma Scales. They wanted to see which items hang together for adults with intellectual disability.
They used exploratory factor analysis on the 22-item form. The goal was to find a clean set of trauma factors for everyday clinical use.
What they found
Four clear factors came out of the data. The team kept 20 items and dropped two: anger and self-harm.
Those dropped items did not load cleanly, so the authors say they need re-writing before use.
How this fits with other research
Pandolfi et al. (2010) saw a similar mess with the GARS-2. Their factor work also failed to confirm the test’s planned subscales and forced them to propose a new four-factor layout. Both papers show that published subscales can break down once you run the numbers.
Adams et al. (2022) hit the same wall with the SRAS-R. The four-factor model did not fit autistic children, and parents asked for autism-specific items. Sarah et al. echo this by dropping anger/self-harm items that did not fit adults with ID. Together these studies warn: check the factor structure before you trust the manual.
Van Gaasbeek et al. (2026) give a brighter view. Their factor work on the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children found a solid five-factor fit in autistic youth. The difference? The SDSC kept all its items while LANTS and SRAS-R had to drop or add items. Method detail and population matter.
Why it matters
If you screen trauma in adults with ID, you can now use the 20-item LANTS and skip the anger and self-harm lines. This saves time and gives cleaner data. Still, watch for future rewrites of those dropped items; they may return in a better form. Until then, pair the LANTS with other tools if you need to track anger or self-injury.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Print the 20-item LANTS sheet and cross out the anger and self-harm lines before your next intake.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Research suggests exposure to adverse life events is elevated in people with intellectual disabilities. We developed the Lancaster and Northgate Trauma Scales (LANTS) to address the limited availability of screening questionnaires for people with intellectual disabilities affected by adverse traumatic experiences. AIMS: The aims of this study were to (i) evaluate the factor structure of the self-report LANTS and (ii) assess compatibility with the International Classification of Diseases Eleventh Revision (ICD-11) criteria for complex PTSD. METHODS AND PROCEDURE: Ninety-eight people with mild to moderate intellectual disability (86 % men; mean age 41 years) completed the self-report LANTS. Exploratory factor analysis was undertaken using a polychoric correlation matrix, appropriate for the LANTS ordinal response options. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Seven items including self-harm and anger were non-normal in distribution and excluded from the analysis; a four-factor structure was identified for the 22 remaining items. We make suggestions for correspondence of LANTS items to ICD-11 criteria for complex PTSD. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This is the first exploratory factor analysis of the LANTS. Items pertaining to anger and self-harm may be prone to response bias and development of these items using qualitative methods would be useful. The findings require replication with a larger group of people with intellectual disabilities, including more women.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2021 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103914