Sex differences in WISC-III profiles of children with high-functioning pervasive developmental disorders.
On WISC-III, girls with high-functioning ASD run Coding faster than boys and show a flatter profile—so don’t wait for a Block Design spike.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Tomonori et al. gave the WISC-III to 62 Japanese kids with high-functioning ASD. Half were girls, half were boys, all .
They compared every sub-test score to see if girls and boys showed the same peaks and dips.
What they found
Girls scored higher on Processing Speed tasks like Coding and Symbol Search. Boys scored higher on Block Design.
Most boys had the classic ASD spike on Block Design. Girls had a flatter, more even profile across all tests.
How this fits with other research
Lehnhardt et al. (2016) found the same girl advantage in Processing Speed when they tested adults diagnosed late in life. The pattern holds from childhood to adulthood.
McGonigle et al. (2014) saw slower visual processing in most high-functioning youth. Tomonori’s girls buck that trend by running the WISC Coding task faster than boys.
Ingadottir et al. (2025) show that kids with ASD+ADHD score higher on perceptual reasoning than kids with ADHD alone. Tomonori’s data remind us to also check sex, not just diagnosis, when we read WISC profiles.
Why it matters
When you see a girl with ASD who lacks the usual Block Design peak, don’t assume the test is wrong. Expect girls to show strength in speed tasks instead. Use this info to pick teaching tools that reward quick responding rather than visual puzzles.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Check the Processing Speed index first when you review a girl’s WISC print-out.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Using the Japanese version of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III), 26 girls with high-functioning (IQ > or = 70) pervasive developmental disorders (HFPDD) (mean age, 8.2 years) were compared with 116 boys with HFPDD (mean age, 9.0 years). Compared with the boys, the girls scored significantly higher on the Processing Speed index, Coding, and Symbol Search, but scored significantly lower on Block Design. Although both groups showed weakness on Comprehension in the verbal domain, the girls' subtest profile in the performance domain was relatively even and significantly different from the boys', which was characterized by a peak on Block Design. Such differences should be replicated, and possible behavioral, neurological, and genetic links to these sex differences should be clarified.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2009 · doi:10.1007/s10803-008-0610-6