Assessment & Research

Review of the Asperger Syndrome Diagnostic Scale.

Goldstein (2002) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2002
★ The Verdict

The Asperger Syndrome Diagnostic Scale lacks proof for clinical use—screen with ASSQ or CAST instead.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who screen school-age children for autism.
✗ Skip if Clinicians only serving adults or using DSM-5 autism criteria.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Leigland (2002) looked at the Asperger Syndrome Diagnostic Scale.

The author asked: Does this scale really separate Asperger from other autism?

It was a narrative review, so no new data were collected.

02

What they found

The scale shows promise for research only.

There is not enough proof it can tell Asperger apart from autism in clinic work.

Sam warns clinicians to wait for stronger validity data.

03

How this fits with other research

Kahng et al. (1999) already showed the ASSQ parent-teacher checklist works for school kids.

Williams et al. (2005) later found the CAST parent form reached 100% sensitivity.

These studies seem to clash with Sam, but they tested different tools.

Sharma et al. (2012) backs Sam up, saying DSM-IV Asperger rules overlap too much with autism.

Together the papers say: some tools work for screening, yet none give a clean Asperger label.

04

Why it matters

You need to pick tools that match your goal.

Use the ASSQ or CAST to flag kids who need full evaluation.

Do not use the Asperger Syndrome Diagnostic Scale to decide eligibility.

Write goals for the child’s symptom profile, not for an Asperger label that may not hold.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Swap any ASDS forms for the ASSQ or CAST parent checklist next screening cycle.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
narrative review
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

The Asperger's Syndrome Diagnostic Scale (2001) was reviewed to determine it's reliability, validity, and clinical utility in the diagnostic process for pervasive developmental disorder, specifically Asperger's syndrome. Concerns were raised about validity of the instrument, population upon which the instrument was normed, capability of the instrument to provide accurate differential diagnoses, and properties of the scale. The measure was determined to hold promise as a research tool, but there appears to be little evidence that it can distinguish among the various types of pervasive developmental disorder or diagnosis Asperger syndrome specifically.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2002 · doi:10.1023/a:1021215300163