Reinforcer assessment for children with developmental disabilities and visual impairments.
Let the child pick between real items instead of asking adults what the child likes.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team worked with children who had both developmental delays and visual impairments.
They compared two ways to find reinforcers. One way let kids pick between items right before work. The other way only asked adults what kids liked.
The goal was to see which method picked items that actually worked as rewards.
What they found
Choice-based testing picked better reinforcers than adult ranking.
Items chosen by the kids themselves kept them working longer and harder.
How this fits with other research
Wanchisen et al. (1989) got the same result six years earlier with preschoolers who had autism. Choice beat simple preference lists there too.
Heinicke et al. (2016) later showed pictures can work, but only if you let kids touch or play with the picture first. That step turns the picture into a real choice, not just a guess.
Kittler et al. (2004) said mix caregiver interviews with direct tests. This study shows the direct test should be a choice, not just watching what a child reaches for.
Why it matters
If your client cannot see well, do not rely on parent report alone. Set out two or three tangible items. Let the child pick right before the task. Use the picked item as the reinforcer. This five-minute step saves you from using rewards that do not work.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Place two edible or tactile items in the child’s hands, let go, and deliver the one the child keeps for the first trial of the day.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
We assessed the applicability of two previously developed reinforcer assessment procedures to children with developmental disabilities and visual impairments. Greater differentiation between stimuli was observed with a choice procedure than with a preference procedure. Measurement of compliance and rate of responding in adaptive skill training confirmed that the choice procedure accurately identified reinforcing stimuli. The preference procedure produced false positive predictions of reinforcer efficacy.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1995 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1995.28-219