Assessment & Research

Postural adaptation during arm raising in children with and without unilateral cerebral palsy.

Ledebt et al. (2014) · Research in developmental disabilities 2014
★ The Verdict

Kids with unilateral CP keep a shrunken forward and weak-side safety zone—train them to lean and reach into that space.

✓ Read this if BCBAs working on balance and ADLs with school-age CP clients.
✗ Skip if Clinicians serving adults with genetic syndromes only.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Ledebt et al. (2014) watched kids raise their arms fast while standing on a force plate. Some kids had unilateral cerebral palsy. Some had typical development.

The team added light wrist weights during some raises. They measured how far each child could sway forward, back, and sideways without falling.

02

What they found

Kids with unilateral CP had smaller safety zones, especially forward and toward the weaker side. Their bodies wobbled more during every arm lift.

When weights were added, the CP group swayed even farther. The limits stayed tight, so small pushes tipped them faster.

03

How this fits with other research

Cherng et al. (2009) found that tilting the seat forward helped kids with spastic CP reach farther and sway less. Both studies show these children need extra stability, but one changed the chair while the other added load to the arms.

Cimolin et al. (2011) and Capodaglio et al. (2011) saw large anterior sway in adults with Prader-Willi syndrome. The direction of weakness looks alike, yet the cause differs: CP comes from brain injury, PWS from low muscle tone.

Rigoldi et al. (2013) used entropy math to show EDS adults have rigid, robotic sway. Annick’s team used simple reach distance, giving a quicker clinic-friendly yardstick for the same balance worry.

04

Why it matters

You now know the safe zone for kids with unilateral CP is smaller in front and on the weak side. Practice weight shifts into that tight space. Use games that ask them to reach across mid-line or lean toward the weaker arm. Start without weights, then add light cuffs only after the child can sway and return smoothly. This builds the balance map their brain is missing and cuts fall risk during daily moves.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Place a favorite toy just outside the child’s forward reach; prompt a slow lean, hold two seconds, return to mid-line, five reps each side.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Population
other
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Postural sway during arm movements were related to the size of the base of support (BOS) and the limits of stability (LOS) of children with unilateral cerebral palsy (USCP) and typically developing (TD) children. For half of the trials the mechanical disturbance due to the rapid arm movement was increased by attaching small weights at the wrists. The participants stood with both feet on a large force plate, which recorded the displacements of the center of pressure (CoP). The results showed that in the children with USCP the LOS forward and toward the non-dominant (more-affected) side were smaller than in the TD children whereas the LOS backward and toward the dominant (less-affected) side did not differ between the two groups. When rapidly moving the arms the children with USCP swayed over a larger portion of their base of support in the forward direction and toward their more-affected side. In addition, the maximal sway toward the more-affected side during arm movement exceeded the LOS while balance was maintained. These effects increased when the movements were performed with the weights at the wrists. These results show that an area of permissible sway, which was not spontaneously explored during the leaning task, was required to maintain balance during the supra-postural task. Training to enlarge the LOS that includes weight shifts toward the more-affected side might reduce the area of the BOS that is self-perceived as less secure.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2014 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.02.007