Assessment & Research

Parents of children with and without intellectual disability: couple relationship and individual well-being.

Norlin et al. (2013) · Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR 2013
★ The Verdict

Fix the coparenting team and Mom feels better six months later.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who write family goals or run parent training in early-intervention or school programs.
✗ Skip if Practitioners who only work 1:1 with clients and never touch family sessions.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team asked two groups of parents about their marriage and their mood. One group had a child with intellectual disability. The other group did not.

They used paper surveys. Parents rated how happy they felt and how well they worked with their partner.

02

What they found

Good marriages and smooth coparenting went hand-in-hand with better well-being. The link showed up in both groups.

Mothers of children with ID reported the lowest well-being of all. Strong coparenting helped them the most six months later.

03

How this fits with other research

Chiu et al. (2017) later built a short Family Quality of Life Scale for Taiwanese families. Their tool lets you track the same couple and family factors the 2013 study measured.

Wang et al. (2010) showed that quality of life folds into one big score for adults with ID. The 2013 paper flips the lens to the parents and finds the same idea: one overall well-being factor tied to couple dynamics.

Hermans et al. (2011) reviewed anxiety tools for adults with ID. Their short list of solid measures can help explain why mothers in the 2013 study felt worse—untreated anxiety may be part of the gap.

04

Why it matters

You already teach play and daily-living skills. Add a five-minute check on how Mom and Dad work as a team. Hand out a coparenting scale or simply ask, "What’s one thing you and your partner handled well this week?" When you spot weak teamwork, offer brief mediation or refer to a couples workshop. Strong coparenting today predicts happier mothers six months from now, so your small check can yield big downstream gains for the whole family.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Start each parent meeting with one coparenting question and note the answer in your SOAP notes.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
423
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

BACKGROUND: Research on parents of children with intellectual disability (ID) has identified a range of risk and protective factors for parental well-being. In family research, the association between marital quality and depression is a vital field of investigation. Still little research has addressed how aspects of the couple relationship affect the adaptation of parents of children with ID. The present study examined predictive links between couple relationship factors (marital quality and coparenting quality) and individual well-being. METHODS: Data were obtained through self-report questionnaires completed by parents of children with ID (mothers, n = 58; and fathers, n = 46) and control children (mothers, n = 178; and fathers, n = 141). To test the hypothesis that couple relationship factors predicted individual well-being, multiple regression analyses were performed controlling for the following risk factors identified by previous research: child self-injury/stereotypic behaviour, parenting stress, and economic risk. RESULTS: Marital quality predicted concurrent well-being, and coparenting quality predicted prospective well-being. Mothers of children with ID reported lower well-being than other parents. CONCLUSIONS: There is a continued need for investigation of the details of the links between couple relationship and individual well-being in parents of children with ID. Couple relationship factors should be given consideration in clinical interventions.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2013 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01564.x