Assessment & Research

On not being noticed: intellectual disabilities and the nonvocal register.

Finlay et al. (2007) · Intellectual and developmental disabilities 2007
★ The Verdict

Adults with ID already gesture to control their world—staff just need to notice and reply.

✓ Read this if BCBAs and RBTs in residential or day programs serving non-speaking adults with intellectual disability.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only serve fully verbal clients.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Researchers watched adults with intellectual disabilities in a group home. The adults had little or no speech.

The team wrote down every nonvocal move the residents made. They also noted when staff saw or missed the move.

02

What they found

Residents used clear gestures to start, stop, or refuse activities. Staff ignored most of these silent bids.

Because the gestures were missed, the adults looked "unengaged" even though they were trying to talk.

03

How this fits with other research

Redquest et al. (2021) extends this idea. Their eye-tracking study shows adults with ID also understand subtle spoken cues that staff rarely test.

Raslear et al. (1992) and Chiang (2008) used the same watch-and-write method. All three papers list small signals—eye-gaze, brief gestures—that get skipped in daily care.

Chiang (2009) adds the teacher side: even when staff prompt, kids give few responses. Together the studies say the problem is not a lack of skill; it is a lack of detection.

04

Why it matters

If you work with non-speaking adults, slow down and scan for tiny movements. A head turn, shoulder shift, or eye close can mean "no." When you answer these moves with action or words, you prove to the resident that communication works. This single change can cut "problem behavior" that is simply a loud replacement for quiet, ignored gestures.

FREE CEUs

Get CEUs on This Topic — Free

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.

60+ on-demand CEUs (ethics, supervision, general)
New live CEU every Wednesday
Community of 500+ BCBAs
100% free to join
Join The ABA Clubhouse — Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick one client, watch for five minutes, and immediately honor any small nonvocal bid you see.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
qualitative
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Gestures unaccompanied by sound risk not being registered by their intended recipient. We chart examples of this in a video recording of a meeting between people with intellectual disabilities and support staff. The recordings reveal that individuals with limited spoken language can, and do, design nonvocal gestures to make intelligible contributions to the conversation; but they are often unseen. Were such contributions to be noticed, they would reveal a variety of contributions to the interaction, notably residents' concerns to display their understanding of the current topic and its interactional requirements. We consider how such unratified contributions may arise out of a dilemma faced by staff and manifest a diminished identity that staff members (and researchers) unwittingly impose on residents.

Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2007 · doi:10.1352/1934-9556(2007)45[227:ONBNID]2.0.CO;2