On not being noticed: intellectual disabilities and the nonvocal register.
Adults with ID already gesture to control their world—staff just need to notice and reply.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers watched adults with intellectual disabilities in a group home. The adults had little or no speech.
The team wrote down every nonvocal move the residents made. They also noted when staff saw or missed the move.
What they found
Residents used clear gestures to start, stop, or refuse activities. Staff ignored most of these silent bids.
Because the gestures were missed, the adults looked "unengaged" even though they were trying to talk.
How this fits with other research
Redquest et al. (2021) extends this idea. Their eye-tracking study shows adults with ID also understand subtle spoken cues that staff rarely test.
Raslear et al. (1992) and Chiang (2008) used the same watch-and-write method. All three papers list small signals—eye-gaze, brief gestures—that get skipped in daily care.
Chiang (2009) adds the teacher side: even when staff prompt, kids give few responses. Together the studies say the problem is not a lack of skill; it is a lack of detection.
Why it matters
If you work with non-speaking adults, slow down and scan for tiny movements. A head turn, shoulder shift, or eye close can mean "no." When you answer these moves with action or words, you prove to the resident that communication works. This single change can cut "problem behavior" that is simply a loud replacement for quiet, ignored gestures.
Get CEUs on This Topic — Free
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Pick one client, watch for five minutes, and immediately honor any small nonvocal bid you see.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Gestures unaccompanied by sound risk not being registered by their intended recipient. We chart examples of this in a video recording of a meeting between people with intellectual disabilities and support staff. The recordings reveal that individuals with limited spoken language can, and do, design nonvocal gestures to make intelligible contributions to the conversation; but they are often unseen. Were such contributions to be noticed, they would reveal a variety of contributions to the interaction, notably residents' concerns to display their understanding of the current topic and its interactional requirements. We consider how such unratified contributions may arise out of a dilemma faced by staff and manifest a diminished identity that staff members (and researchers) unwittingly impose on residents.
Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2007 · doi:10.1352/1934-9556(2007)45[227:ONBNID]2.0.CO;2