Assessment & Research

Neuropsychological and behavioural profiles of students with intellectual development disorder on parents and teachers' perceptions.

Furlin et al. (2021) · Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR 2021
★ The Verdict

Collect both parent and teacher forms; either one flagging high internalising points to a student with ID who needs extra emotional support.

✓ Read this if BCBAs doing intake assessments in schools or clinics.
✗ Skip if Practitioners serving only verbal adults with no ID diagnosis.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team gave two paper checklists to the students with intellectual disability and 112 same-age peers. One checklist went home to parents (CBCL). The other went to teachers (TRF).

They compared the scores to see which items best spotted the kids with ID.

02

What they found

Kids with ID scored higher on almost every problem area. The biggest gap was in internalising problems: withdrawn, sad, anxious items.

A simple rule caught the groups: high internalising score on either form = likely ID. Parent and teacher forms agreed only modestly, so one alone missed cases.

03

How this fits with other research

Dworschak et al. (2016) counted that half of students with ID show challenging behaviour. V et al. now show the same group also shows quieter internalising signs, not just loud topographies.

Balboni et al. (2020) found that, in severe-profound ID, better adaptive skills can sit beside more problem behaviour. V et al. focused on school-age mild-moderate ID and still saw the classic picture: lower adaptive, more behaviour problems. The two studies look opposite until you see they sampled different severity bands and settings.

Libero et al. (2016) taught us to watch RRBI and overactivity as red flags for later self-injury. V et al. add that internalising scores on everyday checklists can serve as an early, low-effort screen before those heavy behaviours ever start.

04

Why it matters

You already use the CBCL or TRF for referrals. Keep using both. Low agreement is not error; it tells you the child behaves differently at home and at school. When either form shows high internalising, dig deeper even if the other form looks fine. Early identification gives you time to teach coping, request breaks, or involve counselling before internalising turns into escape or aggression.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add the CBCL parent form to your next school assessment packet if you already use the teacher form.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Sample size
78
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
positive
Magnitude
large

03Original abstract

BACKGROUND: Children with intellectual development disorder (IDD) have high rates of comorbid neuropsychological and behavioural problems. However, there are not many studies on this population in middle-income and low-income countries. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of neuropsychological and behavioural problems in students with and without IDD and to assess the correlation between the responses from informants (parents and teachers) and the clinical diagnoses in Brazil. METHODS: After clinical diagnosis, 78 male and female students (7-15 years old) were divided into two groups: children with IDD (n = 39) and children without IDD (n = 39). The Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) and Teacher's Report Form (TRF) scales were used to track neuropsychological and behavioural problems. Calculations of prevalence ratios were performed using Poisson regression with Wald tests. The CBCL and TRF results were compared between groups with Mann-Whitney U-tests and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. The agreement between scales was assessed using the Spearman correlation test. RESULTS: Neuropsychological and behavioural problems were significantly more prevalent in students with IDD. The average amount of CBCL problems was significantly higher than that of TRF in the dimensions of thought, attention, somatic, attention deficit/hyperactivity, opposition defiant and total problems. Low-to-moderate correlations between CBCL and TRF dimensions in the IDD group were observed. ROC analyses revealed that the dimensions of internalising problems and total scores reflecting CBCL and TRF problems were the most important factors for identifying neuropsychological and behavioural problems in the IDD group. CONCLUSIONS: Students with IDD require early identification of behavioural and emotional symptoms to avoid the underdiagnoses of various mental health problems, especially those with internalising characteristics. The CBCL and TRF may assist in the early screening of these comorbidities.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2021 · doi:10.1111/jir.12837