Assessment & Research

Neurobehavioral evidence for the "Near-Miss" effect in pathological gamblers.

Habib et al. (2010) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 2010
★ The Verdict

Near-miss slot spins neurologically mimic wins for pathological gamblers—consider this reinforcement illusion when designing gambling-reduction interventions.

✓ Read this if BCBAs working with adults who have gambling problems in outpatient or residential settings.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who serve only young children or clients with no gambling history.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Habib et al. (2010) watched pathological gamblers and healthy adults play a slot machine. The team rigged the game so that near-miss spins—two cherries and a blank—popped up often.

While people played, the researchers scanned their brains. They wanted to see if a almost-win felt like a win or a loss inside the head.

02

What they found

Gamblers’ brains lit up in win zones after a near-miss. Controls showed the opposite—their brains acted as if they had lost.

On the outside both groups kept the same face: no extra button presses or happy shouts. Only the brain scan told the secret.

03

How this fits with other research

Logue et al. (1986) told us to hunt for hidden reinforcers in everyday life. Reza shows one hiding inside a slot machine: the near-miss is a fake win for addicted players.

Whiting et al. (2015) taught college kids to see one roulette color as “better” and their bets shifted. Reza goes deeper—the gambling brain itself rewires, no teaching needed.

Johnstone et al. (1996) found people over-report rare events even when payouts are equal. Reza adds a clinical twist: for pathological gamblers the rare near-miss is tagged as a jackpot inside the head.

04

Why it matters

If you treat gambling as a reinforced behavior, know that near-misses are turbo-charged reinforcers for pathological clients. When you write a treatment plan, block access to games that celebrate almost-wins—scratch tickets, slots, phone apps. Replace them with activities that give clear, real wins your client can count.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Check your client’s preferred games for near-miss features and remove or restrict them this week.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Sample size
22
Population
substance use disorder, neurotypical
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

The purpose of this translational study was twofold: (1) to contrast behavioral and brain activity between pathological and nonpathological gamblers, and (2) to examine differences as a function of the outcome of the spin of a slot machine, focusing predominately on the "Near-Miss"--when two reels stop on the same symbol, and that symbol is just above or below the payoff line on the third reel. Twenty-two participants (11 nonpathological; 11 pathological) completed the study by rating the closeness of various outcomes of slot machine displays (wins, losses, and near-misses) to a win. No behavioral differences were observed between groups of participants, however, differences in brain activity were found in the left midbrain, near the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area (SN / VTA). Near-miss outcomes uniquely activated brain regions associated with wins for the pathological gamblers and regions associated with losses for the nonpathological gamblers. Thus, near-miss outcomes on slot machines may contain both functional and neurological properties of wins for pathological gamblers. Such a translational approach to the study of gambling behavior may be considered an example that gives life to B. F. Skinner's conceptualization of the physiologist of the future.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2010 · doi:10.1901/jeab.2010.93-313