Mortality in people with intellectual disabilities in England.
English adults with ID lose twenty years of life to mostly preventable causes—so run tight screens for aspiration, seizures, and heart issues.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team tracked every adult with intellectual disability (ID) in England for one year. They used national death records to see who died and why. They compared these numbers to the general English population.
What they found
Adults with ID died three times more often and lived 19.7 fewer years. Big killers were stroke, blood clots, epilepsy, and choking on food. Most of these deaths can be stopped with early care.
How this fits with other research
Heald et al. (2020) looked at older Swedes with ID and cancer. They found the same group gets half the specialist visits and dies at home 69 % of the time. Together the papers show short lives and thin care.
Martin et al. (1997) showed that simple diet fixes stop weight loss and aspiration in clients with dysphagia. Amaral et al. (2017) now prove those very risks are top causes of death. The old feeding study foretold the new mortality data.
Lancioni et al. (2006) mapped psychiatric illness in English adults with ID eleven years earlier. Their baseline picture helps explain why the 2017 death counts are so high—untreated mental health adds physical risk.
Why it matters
You can add years to your clients’ lives today. Screen for swallow problems at every visit. Ask about chest infections, check seizure logs, and push for cardiology referrals. Write these checks into the ISP so nothing is missed.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a one-page swallow-safety checklist to each client’s ISP and review it every quarter.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
BACKGROUND: People with intellectual disabilities (IDs) die at younger ages than the general population, but nationally representative and internationally comparable mortality data about people with ID, quantifying the extent and pattern of the excess, have not previously been reported for England. METHOD: We used data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink database for April 2010 to March 2014 (CPRD GOLD September 2015). This source covered several hundred participating general practices comprising roughly 5% of the population of England in the period studied. General practitioner (GP) records identified people diagnosed by their GP as having ID. Linked national death certification data allowed us to derive corresponding mortality data for people with and without ID, overall and by cause. RESULTS: Mortality rates for people with ID were significantly higher than for those without. Their all-cause standardised mortality ratio was 3.18. Their life expectancy at birth was 19.7 years lower than for people without ID. Circulatory and respiratory diseases and neoplasms were the three most common causes of death for them. Cerebrovascular disease, thrombophlebitis and pulmonary embolism all had standardised mortality ratios greater than 3 in people with ID. This has not been described before. Other potentially avoidable causes included epilepsy (3.9% of deaths), aspiration pneumonitis (3.6%) and colorectal cancer (2.4%). Avoidable mortality analysis showed a higher proportion of deaths from causes classified as amenable to good medical care but a lower proportion from preventable causes compared with people without ID. International comparison to areas for which data have been published in sufficient detail for calculation of directly standardised rates suggest England may have higher death rates for people with ID than areas in Canada and Finland, and lower death rates than Ireland or the State of Massachusetts in the USA. CONCLUSIONS: National data about mortality in people with ID provides a basis for public health interventions. Linked data using GP records to identify people with ID could provide comprehensive population-based monitoring in England, unbiased by the circumstances of illnesses or death; to date information governance constraints have prevented this. However, GPs in England currently identify only around 0.5% of the population as having ID, suggesting that individuals with mild, non-syndromic ID are largely missed. Notably common causes of death suggest control of cardiovascular risk factors, epilepsy and dysphagia, management of thrombotic risks and colorectal screening are important areas for health promotion initiatives.
Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2017 · doi:10.1111/jir.12314