Assessment & Research

Measuring the involvement in family life of children with autism spectrum disorder: A DBPNet study.

Schwartz et al. (2018) · Research in developmental disabilities 2018
★ The Verdict

A two-minute parent quiz shows kids with autism join less in family life, and the gap grows with severity.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing participation goals for school-age clients.
✗ Skip if Clinicians focused only on severe behavior reduction.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team wanted a fast way to measure how much kids with autism take part in everyday family life. They tested the PROMIS Family Involvement CAT on 250 U.S. children with ASD . Parents answered 4-12 questions on a tablet; the computer picked each next item based on the last answer.

Kids also took the Social Responsiveness Scale so the researchers could link involvement scores to autism severity. A matched group of typical kids took the same CAT for comparison.

02

What they found

The CAT is valid and takes under two minutes. Children with ASD scored lower on family involvement than their typical peers. The gap widened as autism severity increased.

No floor or ceiling effects showed up, so the tool can track both low and high involvement.

03

How this fits with other research

Delgado-Lobete et al. (2020) later extended the same PROMIS family into a lifespan quality-of-life battery (PAB-L) for . Both studies find autistic individuals scoring below norms, showing the pattern starts in childhood and persists.

Lin et al. (2026) used a Taiwan registry to show that communication deficits, not motor issues, limit participation in older youth. Justin’s CAT now lets you catch that same communication-linked restriction early, right in the home.

Miltenberger et al. (2013) found parents report fewer activity types for kids with ASD even when accelerometers show equal moderate-vigorous minutes. Likewise, Justin’s parent-report CAT flags lower family involvement, reminding us that parent perspective and objective counts can differ—use both when possible.

04

Why it matters

You now have a 2-minute screener that tells you if a child is pulling back from family routines like meals, outings, or game night. Low scores can trigger goals around communication, play, or sibling interaction. Re-administer every three months to see if your intervention is bringing the child back into family life.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add the PROMIS Family Involvement CAT to your intake packet and set a goal if the score is below 40.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
114
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

BACKGROUND: Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) have social and communication deficits that impair their involvement in family life. No measures of child involvement in the family have been validated for the ASD population. AIM: To evaluate the validity of a measure of Family Involvement (FI) of children ages 5-12 with ASD. METHOD: Parents of children ages 5-12 with ASD (n = 114) completed FI items from the PROMIS® pediatric Family Relationships item bank in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) format, as well as measures of ASD symptom burden, parenting stress, and parental depression. Medical record review provided child intelligence or developmental quotient. A reference sample (n = 236) closely matching the ASD sample in age and gender was created from the national standardization sample, and underwent a simulated CAT. RESULTS: The CAT precisely and efficiently measured parent-reported FI of children with ASD. Average FI scores were lower among children with ASD (M = 46.3, SD = 7.1) than children in the reference sample (M = 52.5, SD = 9.1). A "dose response" decrease in FI was observed as ASD severity increased. Increased parenting stress was associated with lower FI. No relationship between FI and child IQ was found. CONCLUSION: The FI items captured FI among children ages 5-12 with ASD with acceptable precision. Reduced FI among children with ASD, particularly those with higher symptom severity, suggests validity of the items in this population.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2018 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2018.07.012