Assessment & Research

Low noise in autism: cause or consequence?

Gliga et al. (2015) · Autism : the international journal of research and practice 2015
★ The Verdict

Adult ‘low neural noise’ in autism may be a learned shield, not a built-in trait—so keep checking sensory needs across the lifespan.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing sensory goals for school-age or adult clients.
✗ Skip if Clinicians only treating toddlers with no sensory plan.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Gliga et al. (2015) wrote a theory paper. They asked: does the autistic brain start quiet, or does it learn to be quiet?

The team looked at adult EEG studies. These studies show less background noise in autistic brains. The authors said this calm may be a payoff after years of coping, not the first cause.

They urged scientists to run long-term studies. Track the same kids for years. See if noise drops only after repeated practice.

02

What they found

The paper finds no proof that low neural noise begins in infancy. It warns against treating adult EEG snapshots as birth traits.

Instead, the quiet signal may be a plastic, late-emerging fix. The brain turns down its own volume to deal with a busy world.

03

How this fits with other research

Shan et al. (2025) gives the very data the target wants. They scanned 800 autistic people many times. Sensory networks flipped from hyper- to hypo-connectivity just before teen years. This supports the idea that low noise can arrive later, not at birth.

Northrup et al. (2022) adds a parent view. In 4 104 autistic kids and adults, six out of ten had current sound sensitivity. If the brain grows quieter with age, yet ears still hurt, noise may drop in cortex but not in behavior.

McQuaid et al. (2024) shows the story holds in mid-life. Autistic adults still report loud sounds as painful even if their EEG looks calm. The mismatch tells us to watch real-life responses, not just brain waves.

04

Why it matters

For you as a BCBA, this means today’s calm client may have worked years to get there. Don’t assume past goals were easy. Ask about earlier sound sensitivities and adjust prompts now. Track sensory behaviors over months, not just one baseline. If you see sudden sound avoidance return, treat it as new data, not old history.

FREE CEUs

Get CEUs on This Topic — Free

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.

60+ on-demand CEUs (ethics, supervision, general)
New live CEU every Wednesday
Community of 500+ BCBAs
100% free to join
Join The ABA Clubhouse — Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add one question to your intake: ‘Describe any past or returning sound discomfort’ and chart it each session.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
theoretical
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

In their article, Davis and Plaisted-Grant eloquently challenge current thinking about autism. Specifically, they hypothesize that low noise is a critical factor in explaining certain characteristics of the syndrome. Critically, they argue that “any lower noise will be present in all cortical processes throughout development, and that any group differences will reflect low noise directly, not compensatory responses or transient stages during development.” The dynamic nature of early brain development, we believe, makes it unlikely that such phenotypic stability will be observed from early development to adulthood. We suggest that there is potentially greater explanatory value in considering the possibility that low cortical noise in adulthood is a compensatory response to an earlier dysfunction. Below, we outline our point of view and suggest ways in which it can be tested.

Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2015 · doi:10.1177/1362361314561531