Assessment & Research

Impairments in multisensory processing are not universal to the autism spectrum: no evidence for crossmodal priming deficits in Asperger syndrome.

David et al. (2011) · Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research 2011
★ The Verdict

Crossmodal priming with nonsocial stimuli is intact in adults with Asperger syndrome, so don’t assume universal multisensory deficits.

✓ Read this if BCBAs working with adults or teens with Asperger syndrome in clinic or vocational settings.
✗ Skip if Clinicians only serving young children or those with severe sensory loss.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

David et al. (2011) tested crossmodal priming in adults with Asperger syndrome.

They used simple sounds and pictures that were not social.

The team asked: do these adults link sight and sound as fast as typical adults?

02

What they found

The Asperger group showed the same priming boost as controls.

There was no lag in joining a sound to a later picture.

The authors say a broad multisensory deficit is not true for this group.

03

How this fits with other research

Charbonneau et al. (2020) saw weaker visual-tactile integration in autistic adults.

The tasks differ: Nicole used nonsocial sound-to-picture primes; Geneviève used touch and vision together.

Regener et al. (2024) also found timing trouble, but only with social clips and a harder simultaneity task.

Nicole’s null result stays clean because the stimuli were simple and sequential.

Adams et al. (2024) add brain data: autistic adults show slower auditory brain waves even when behavior looks normal.

The priming can look fine while EEG still flags a neural gap.

04

Why it matters

Do not assume every client with Asperger or ASD will struggle to pair sights and sounds.

If you use nonsocial cues in instruction or AAC, the link may work fine.

Still watch for subtle timing issues in social or touch tasks; those may need extra support.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Try pairing a brief tone with a picture card during teaching; drop the prompt if the learner links them without extra help.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Sample size
30
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
null

03Original abstract

Individuals suffering from autism spectrum disorders (ASD) often show a tendency for detail- or feature-based perception (also referred to as "local processing bias") instead of more holistic stimulus processing typical for unaffected people. This local processing bias has been demonstrated for the visual and auditory domains and there is evidence that multisensory processing may also be affected in ASD. Most multisensory processing paradigms used social-communicative stimuli, such as human speech or faces, probing the processing of simultaneously occuring sensory signals. Multisensory processing, however, is not limited to simultaneous stimulation. In this study, we investigated whether multisensory processing deficits in ASD persist when semantically complex but nonsocial stimuli are presented in succession. Fifteen adult individuals with Asperger syndrome and 15 control persons participated in a visual-audio priming task, which required the classification of sounds that were either primed by semantically congruent or incongruent preceding pictures of objects. As expected, performance on congruent trials was faster and more accurate compared with incongruent trials (crossmodal priming effect). The Asperger group, however, did not differ significantly from the control group. Our results do not support a general multisensory processing deficit, which is universal to the entire autism spectrum.

Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2011 · doi:10.1002/aur.210