Identity Matching and Stimulus Equivalence Learning Paradigms for Memory Rehabilitation of Explicit Memory Deficits: A Scoping Review
Stimulus-equivalence memory training for dementia is still experimental—use differential-outcome procedures if piloting, but demand rigorous single-case controls.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Schedlowski et al. (2025) looked at every paper that tried stimulus-equivalence drills to help people with dementia remember better.
They pulled studies that used identity matching, arbitrary matching, or the differential-outcome procedure (DOP).
The team asked: do these drills fix explicit memory loss, and how good is the evidence?
What they found
The answer is “maybe, but the proof is thin.”
Some DOP studies showed hopeful trends, yet most designs were too weak to trust.
Overall, stimulus-equivalence memory training for dementia is still experimental.
How this fits with other research
Cordova et al. (1993) give hope: 34 out of 44 adults with moderate or severe ID learned generalized identity matching.
That shows the task itself is doable, even with brain-based limits.
Prichard et al. (2015) add a warning: rats mastered identity relations yet failed symmetry, proving outcomes can be narrow and fragile.
Put together, the data say identity matching is worth piloting, but plan for fragile classes and test symmetry, not just identity.
Why it matters
If you serve adults with dementia, treat stimulus-equivalence memory work as a pilot, not a sure bet.
Use DOP if you try it, run tight single-case designs, and probe for symmetry and generalization.
Keep your data visible so you can adjust fast or stop if gains fade.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Run a three-tier DOP identity-matching probe with one client, collect baseline, and graph symmetry trials from day one.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Explicit memory dysfunction, such as in Alzheimer’s dementia, impairs learning and daily functioning, requiring effective rehabilitation strategies to promote functional independence. Relational learning paradigms such as stimulus equivalence learning (SEL) imply the formation of networks of relations in which trained relations give rise to emergent relations, potentially providing a novel approach to addressing deficits in remembering and stimulus control. We evaluated the scope and nature of research on the application of relational learning paradigms for memory rehabilitation. In particular, we outline the evidence for the efficacy of identity matching and SEL in specific disorders, the associated effective strategies, and challenges to guide future research. A systematic search following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines identified 23 reports categorized into identity matching, arbitrary matching, and differential outcome procedure (DOP) paradigms. Findings were mixed regarding the success of training procedures. Studies indicate particularly positive outcomes under the DOP and overall efficacy seemed to depend on impairment severity. However, current evidence on the efficacy of relational learning paradigms in individuals with explicit memory dysfunction remains inconclusive due to uncontrolled designs and methodological weaknesses in statistical analysis and patient reporting. Nevertheless, insights from the reviewed studies can inform more rigorous future research. The focus should be on identifying the necessary and sufficient conditions for training stimulus equivalence relations in this population, within meaningful and well-controlled experimental designs to validate the preliminary findings and assess SEL’s potential as a cognitive intervention.
Perspectives on Behavior Science, 2025 · doi:10.1007/s40614-025-00475-z