Assessment & Research

How Can Single-Case Data Be Analyzed? Software Resources, Tutorial, and Reflections on Analysis.

Manolov et al. (2017) · Behavior modification 2017
★ The Verdict

Free R code now turns your single-case graphs into statistics you can cite.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who write reports or submit to journals.
✗ Skip if Practitioners who only use paper graphs and never touch a computer.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Manolov et al. (2017) built free R tools that mix graphs with statistics for single-case work.

The paper shows how to run level-shift tests, trend lines, and effect sizes in one click.

You still get the familiar line graph, but now it carries p-values and confidence bands.

02

What they found

No new client data were collected.

The team proved the code works on old data sets and posted everything on GitHub.

Users can copy two lines of R and reproduce any figure or number in the tutorial.

03

How this fits with other research

Ruiz et al. (2025) now supersedes this work. Their RDARBS package makes the same plots in under a minute without writing code.

Gilroy et al. (2025) extends the idea to literature reviews. SCARF-UI is a point-and-click website that applies the target’s logic to whole groups of studies.

Wolfe et al. (2019) looks like a rival at first glance—they push visual-only rules while Rumen pushes statistics. In truth the two tools answer different questions: Wolfe helps you decide fast if an effect is visible; Rumen gives numbers for the journal reviewer who wants p-values.

04

Why it matters

You no longer have to choose between eyeballing graphs or paying for expensive software. The free tools from this paper—and the even easier 2025 updates—let you show parents, teachers, and reviewers both a clear picture and a solid number. Download the package, run your next A-B-A-B data, and paste the output straight into your report.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Install the R package, load last week’s client data, and print one graph with confidence bands to see if the intervention crossed the significance line.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
methodology paper
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

The present article aims to present a series of software developments in the quantitative analysis of data obtained via single-case experimental designs (SCEDs), as well as the tutorial describing these developments. The tutorial focuses on software implementations based on freely available platforms such as R and aims to bring statistical advances closer to applied researchers and help them become autonomous agents in the data analysis stage of a study. The range of analyses dealt with in the tutorial is illustrated on a typical single-case dataset, relying heavily on graphical data representations. We illustrate how visual and quantitative analyses can be used jointly, giving complementary information and helping the researcher decide whether there is an intervention effect, how large it is, and whether it is practically significant. To help applied researchers in the use of the analyses, we have organized the data in the different ways required by the different analytical procedures and made these data available online. We also provide Internet links to all free software available, as well as all the main references to the analytical techniques. Finally, we suggest that appropriate and informative data analysis is likely to be a step forward in documenting and communicating results and also for increasing the scientific credibility of SCEDs.

Behavior modification, 2017 · doi:10.1177/0145445516664307